Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156944›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2020

Implementation research and human-centred design: how theory driven human-centred design can sustain trust in complex health systems, support measurement and drive sustained community health volunteer engagement.

Mary B Adam, Joy Minyenya-Njuguna, Wilson Karuri Kamiru, Simon Mbugua, Naomi Wambui Makobu, Angela J Donelson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Using Human-Centred Design to Codesign Patient Engagement Tools With a Patient Advisory Council: Successes and Challenges.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary B AdamAIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, PO Box 20, 00220, Kenya.
Joy Minyenya-NjugunaAIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, PO Box 20, 00220, Kenya.
Wilson Karuri KamiruAIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, PO Box 20, 00220, Kenya.
Simon MbuguaAIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, PO Box 20, 00220, Kenya.
Naomi Wambui MakobuAIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, PO Box 20, 00220, Kenya.
Angela J DonelsonDonelson Consulting, 3173 Adelle Place, Tucson, Arizona, 85749, USA.
Kijabe Hospital · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-centred design (HCD) can support complex health system interventions by navigating thorny implementation problems that often derail population health efforts. HCD is a pragmatic, 'practice framework', not an intervention protocol. It can build empathy by bringing patient voice, user perspective and innovation to construct and repair pieces of the intervention or health system. However, its emphasis on product development and process change with fixed end points has left it as an approach lacking explanatory power and reproducible measurement. Yet when informed by theory, the tremendous innovation potential of HCD can be harnessed to drive sustainability, mediate implementation problems, frame measurement constructs and ultimately improve population-level health outcomes. In attempting to mine, the potential of HCD we move beyond the pragmatic 'how it works', to the theoretical question, 'why it works'. In doing so, we explore a more fundamental human question, 'How can participation and engagement be sustained for impact in close to the community health systems?' In this exploration, we illustrate the power of HCD by linking it to our theory of trust building. The research method we utilize is that of a longitudinal process evaluation. We leverage the heterogeneity of five community health units from the diverse setting (rural, peri-urban slum) to better understand what works for whom and in what context by tracking 21 groups of community health volunteers (CHVs) over 12 months. We report results with a focus on the outlier case failure to illustrate the contrast with common features of sustained CHV engagement, where recurrent reciprocal cycles of trust building are demonstrated in the successful implementation of action plans in plan-do-study-act cycles for improvement. All was accomplished by CHVs with no external funding. We conclude by discussing how HCD could be unleashed if linked to theoretical frameworks, increasing ability to address implementation challenges in complex health systems.

Indexed as

Public HealthTrustGovernment ProgramsHumansResearch DesignVolunteershealth systemHuman-centred designimplementation researchmeasurementprocess evaluationreciprocitytrusttrust relationships

Identifiers

PMID33156944
PMCPMC7646726
OpenAlexW3097815365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.