Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156943›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2020

Harnessing the health systems strengthening potential of quality improvement using realist evaluation: an example from southern Tanzania.

Fatuma Manzi, Tanya Marchant, Claudia Hanson, Joanna Schellenberg, Elibariki Mkumbo, Mwanaidi Mlaguzi, Tara Tancred

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatuma ManziHealth Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Joanna SchellenbergDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Elibariki MkumboHealth Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mwanaidi MlaguziHealth Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tara TancredDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality improvement (QI) is a problem-solving approach in which stakeholders identify context-specific problems and create and implement strategies to address these. It is an approach that is increasingly used to support health system strengthening, which is widely promoted in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, few QI initiatives are sustained and implementation is poorly understood. Here, we propose realist evaluation to fill this gap, sharing an example from southern Tanzania. We use realist evaluation to generate insights around the mechanisms driving QI implementation. These insights can be harnessed to maximize capacity strengthening in QI and to support its operationalization, thus contributing to health systems strengthening. Realist evaluation begins by establishing an initial programme theory, which is presented here. We generated this through an elicitation approach, in which multiple sources (theoretical literature, a document review and previous project reports) were collated and analysed retroductively to generate hypotheses about how the QI intervention is expected to produce specific outcomes linked to implementation. These were organized by health systems building blocks to show how each block may be strengthened through QI processes. Our initial programme theory draws from empowerment theory and emphasizes the self-reinforcing nature of QI: the more it is implemented, the more improvements result, further empowering people to use it. We identified that opportunities that support skill- and confidence-strengthening are essential to optimizing QI, and thus, to maximizing health systems strengthening through QI. Realist evaluation can be used to generate rich implementation data for QI, showcasing how it can be supported in 'real-world' conditions for health systems strengthening.

Indexed as

Government ProgramsQuality ImprovementHumansTanzaniahealth systems strengtheningImplementation researchLMICsmaternal and newborn healthquality improvementrealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33156943
PMCPMC7646731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.