Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156890›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2020

Comparative chromosomal mapping of microsatellite repeats reveals divergent patterns of accumulation in 12 Siluridae (Teleostei: Siluriformes) species.

Sukhonthip Ditcharoen, Francisco de Menezes Cavalcante Sassi, Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo, Wagner Franco Molina, Thomas Liehr, Pasakorn Saenjundaeng, Alongklod Tanomtong, Weerayuth Supiwong, Chatmongkon Suwannapoom, Marcelo de Bello Cioffi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sukhonthip DitcharoenKhon Kaen University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Muang, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Francisco de Menezes Cavalcante SassiUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), Departamento de Genética e Evolução, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Luiz Antonio Carlos BertolloUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), Departamento de Genética e Evolução, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Wagner Franco MolinaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Centro de Biociências, Departamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-0952
Thomas LiehrUniversity Hospital Jena, Institute of Human Genetics, Jena, Germany.
Pasakorn SaenjundaengKhon Kaen University, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, Nong Khai Campus, Muang, Nong Khai, Thailand.
Alongklod TanomtongKhon Kaen University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Muang, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Weerayuth SupiwongKhon Kaen University, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, Nong Khai Campus, Muang, Nong Khai, Thailand.
Chatmongkon SuwannapoomUniversity of Phayao, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Fishery, Muang Phayao, Thailand.
Marcelo de Bello CioffiUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), Departamento de Genética e Evolução, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-1464
Khon Kaen University · THUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRJena University Hospital · DEUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversity of Phayao · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The freshwater family Siluridae occurs in Eurasia and is especially speciose in South and Southeast Asia, representing an important aquaculture and fishery targets. However, despite the restricted cytogenetic data, a high diploid number variation (from 2n=40 to 92) characterizes this fish group. Considering the large genomic divergence among its species, silurid genomes have experienced an enormous diversification throughout their evolutionary history. Here, we aim to investigate the chromosomal distribution of several microsatellite repeats in 12 Siluridae species and infer about their possible roles in the karyotype evolution that occurred in this group. Our results indicate divergent patterns of microsatellite distribution and accumulation among the analyzed species. Indeed, they are especially present in significant chromosome locations, such as the centromeric and telomeric regions, precisely the ones associated with several kinds of chromosomal rearrangements. Our data provide pieces of evidence that repetitive DNAs played a direct role in fostering the chromosomal differentiation and biodiversity in this fish family.

Identifiers

PMID33156890
PMCPMC7654372
OpenAlexW3097627539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.