ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021
A review of paediatric soft tissues masses referred to a tertiary musculoskeletal sarcoma centre.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Ischial Tuberosity Avulsion Fracture Mimicking Calcified Mass on Plain Films: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the differential diagnosis of musculoskeletal soft tissue masses in children referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology unit.
methodsAll children (0-18 y) referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology unit over a 20-month period (September 2018-May 2020) were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and referral diagnoses were obtained from the electronic patient notes. MRI findings and histopathological results were recorded. The comparison of non-neoplastic, benign neoplastic and malignant diagnoses at the point of referral and final diagnosis was determined.
results116 patients were included, 60 (51.7%) males and 56 (48.3%) females with mean age of 10.6 years (3 months-18 years). 69 (59.5%) patients were referred with a suspected sarcoma, 29 (25.0%) with a suspected benign tumour and 18 (15.5%) with a non-neoplastic lesion. A diagnosis was achieved by histological assessment in 61 (52.6%) cases, microbiological assessment in 3 (2.6%) or clinical and imaging assessment in 52 (44.8%). 67 (57.8%) cases had non-neoplastic pathology, 39 (33.6%) a benign tumour, 4 (3.4%) an intermediate-grade tumour, 6 (5.2%) a malignant tumour.
conclusionsAlthough over half of children referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology unit were suspected of having a soft tissue sarcoma at referral, only 5.2% were diagnosed with a malignant tumour. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Approximately, 6 of 69 (8.7%) children referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology unit with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma will have a malignant lesion. Most paediatric soft tissue masses are non-neoplastic, the commonest diagnosis being a vascular malformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.