Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156540›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2021

Adverse events of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in older adults with depression, a systematic review of the literature.

Geke M Overvliet, Rebecca A C Jansen, Anton J L M van Balkom, Dilene C van Campen, Mardien L Oudega, Ysbrand D van der Werf, Eric van Exel, Odile A van den Heuvel, Annemiek Dols

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Effectiveness of Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression in Older US Military Veterans.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geke M OvervlietDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-8215
Rebecca A C JansenDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anton J L M van BalkomGGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Dilene C van CampenDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mardien L OudegaDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ysbrand D van der WerfDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Eric van ExelDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Odile A van den HeuvelDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Annemiek DolsDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1964-0318
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLGGZ inGeest · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the last decade, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been introduced as a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for depression. Little is known, however, about (serious) adverse events (AE) of rTMS in older adults with a depression. In this article, we want to study what is known about (serious) AE of rTMS in older adults (>60 years) with late-life depression (LLD).

methodsA systematic search has been performed according to the PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, EMBase and PsycInfo. We have screened 622 articles for eligibility. Eleven studies, evaluating 353 patients in total, were included in this review.

resultsAE were reported in 12.4% of the older adults with a LLD treated with rTMS, serious AE in 1.5%. Headache (6.9%) and discomfort at the stimulation site (2.7%) are the most commonly reported AE. Serious AE reported are: psychiatric hospitalization (three times), a combination of posterior vitreous detachment and retinal tear, and increased suicide ideation (both once).

conclusionsrTMS in older adults with LLD was concluded overall to be safe due to the low frequency of AE reported in trials and observational studies. In case-reports, however, more serious AE have been described. To tailor use of rTMS in older adults with LLD, more research is needed in larger samples to optimize tolerance.

Indexed as

DepressionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAgedHumansTreatment Outcomeadverse eventslate life depressionolder adultsrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationserious adverse events

Identifiers

PMID33156540
PMCPMC7894543
OpenAlexW3092121169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.