Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156490›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

A scoping review characterizing "Choosing Wisely®" recommendations for breast cancer management.

Hely Shah, Julian Surujballi, Arif Ali Awan, Brian Hutton, Angel Arnaout, Risa Shorr, Lisa Vandermeer, Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani, Mark Clemons

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Choosing Wisely recommendations in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hely ShahDepartment of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Julian SurujballiDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Arif Ali AwanDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Brian HuttonThe University of Ottawa, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Angel ArnaoutDepartment of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Risa ShorrThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Lisa VandermeerOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mashari Jemaan AlzahraniDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mark ClemonsDepartment of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada. mclemons@toh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0738-2713
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChoosing Wisely (CW)® was created by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) to promote patient-physician conversations about unnecessary medical interventions. Similarly, other countries created their own panels of experts called "CW® campaigns" which review recommendations submitted by that country's oncology societies. We performed a scoping review to consolidate CW® recommendations from different groups with respect to breast cancer care.

methodsA systematic search of Medline and Embase was designed by an information specialist for publications presenting CW® recommendations for breast cancer care practices from 2011-2020. We also reviewed the websites of all CW® campaigns and reference sections of each CW® recommendation. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and performed data extraction. Findings were summarized narratively.

resultsReview of ABIM CW® recommendations showed 19 breast cancer-related recommendations pertaining to; screening (n = 4), radiological staging (n = 2), treatment (n = 10), surveillance (n = 2), and miscellaneous (genetic testing; n = 1). Of 22 countries with CW® campaigns, 10 published recommendations for breast cancer. Over half (57%) of recommendations were supported by more than one country. No recommendations were refuted between campaigns. Two campaigns developed 3 novel recommendations on new topics, including chemotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ (Italy) and comparison of screening imaging modalities (Portugal).

conclusionsCW® recommendations focus on reducing overutilization of investigations and treatments. There was a high rate of consensus between different CW® campaigns. As health care systems globally move attention to reduce low-value care, further studies are required to address adherence to these current recommendations and develop new recommendations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansItalyMass ScreeningPortugalUnited StatesBreastCancerChoosing wisely®

Identifiers

PMID33156490
OpenAlexW3096017934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.