Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156481›Full record

ArticleProgress in biomaterials2020

Nanoscale mechanical properties of chitosan hydrogels as revealed by AFM.

A Ben Bouali, A Montembault, L David, Y Von Boxberg, M Viallon, B Hamdi, F Nothias, R Fodil, S Féréol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Autosomal Dominant MissenseHuman mutation · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microfluidic Organ-on-A-chip: A Guide to Biomaterial Choice and Fabrication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A Ben BoualiUniv Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010, Creteil, France.
A MontembaultIMP, CNRS UMR 5223, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
L DavidIMP, CNRS UMR 5223, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-8537
Y Von BoxbergCNRS UMR 8246, INSERM U 1130, Neuroscience Paris Seine NPS, F-75005, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-6155
M ViallonIMP, CNRS UMR 5223, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
B HamdiLEPCMAE, USTHB, Bab Ezzouar, Alger, Algérie.
F NothiasCNRS UMR 8246, INSERM U 1130, Neuroscience Paris Seine NPS, F-75005, Paris, France.
R FodilUniv Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010, Creteil, France. redouane.fodil@u-pec.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8871-2437
S FéréolUniv Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010, Creteil, France. sophie.fereol@u-pec.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4113-1106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of tissue engineering, chitosan hydrogels are attractive biomaterials because they represent a family of natural polymers exhibiting several suitable features (cytocompatibility, bioresorbability, wound healing, bacteriostatic and fungistatic properties, structural similarity with glycosaminoglycans), and tunable mechanical properties. Optimizing the design of these biomaterials requires fine knowledge of its physical characteristics prior to assessment of the cell-biomaterial interactions. In this work, using atomic force microscopy (AFM), we report a characterization of mechanical and topographical properties at the submicron range of chitosan hydrogels, depending on physico-chemical parameters such as their polymer concentration (1.5%, 2.5% and 3.5%), their degree of acetylation (4% and 38.5%), and the conditions of the gelation process. Well-known polyacrylamide gels were used to validate the methodology approach for the determination and analysis of elastic modulus (i.e., Young's modulus) distribution at the gel surface. We present elastic modulus distribution and topographical and stiffness maps for different chitosan hydrogels. For each chitosan hydrogel formulation, AFM analyses reveal a specific asymmetric elastic modulus distribution that constitutes a useful hallmark for chitosan hydrogel characterization. Our results regarding the local mechanical properties and the topography of chitosan hydrogels initiate new possibilities for an interpretation of the behavior of cells in contact with such soft materials.

Indexed as

Atomic force microscopyChitosan hydrogel gelationYoung’s modulus distribution

Identifiers

PMID33156481
PMCPMC7718388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.