Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156433›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Assessing the engagement of children and families in selecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and developing their measures: a systematic review.

Malcolm McNeill, Samantha Noyek, Eshetu Engeda, Nora Fayed

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research: A rapid umbrella review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Developing an Inclusive Dance Guide for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Co-Design Process and Initial Feasibility Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malcolm McNeillSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Samantha NoyekSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada. s.noyek@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8379-017X
Eshetu EngedaSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Nora FayedSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess child and family engagement in the selection of patient-reported outcomes for clinical studies/clinical settings and development of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)/patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) across the pediatric literature.

methodsDatabases were reviewed: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Articles published from December 2009 to September 2018 pertaining to the selection of outcomes or development of PROMs/PREMs for children or families were included. The International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) Spectrum of Public Participation was used to classify levels of engagement across each article; IAP2 plots engagement on a spectrum across five stages (from minimal to most engagement): Inform, Consult, Involve, Collaborate, and Empower.

results9019 non-duplicate articles were screened; 36 articles met inclusion criteria, seven studies focused on the selection of outcomes, and 29 studies pertained to PROM/PREM development. Twenty-three articles adhered to 'Involve' level of engagement. Four articles were categorized as 'Collaborate,' seven articles were classified as 'Consult,' and three articles were categorized as 'Inform'.

conclusionChildren and families were sparsely engaged as co-conductors or equal partners in the selection or development of PRO research; involvement remained on the mid-low end of the IAP2 Spectrum. Engaging with children and families as collaborators can improve the patient-centredness, rigour, and applicability of PROM/PREM research.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresChildHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesChildExperience measureFamilyOutcome measurePatient engagementPatient report

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.