ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Myocardial perfusion assessment in the infarct core and penumbra zones in an in-vivo porcine model of the acute, sub-acute, and chronic infarction.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing and evaluating a chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy in swine model by rest and stress CMR.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging-state of the art.European radiology · 2023Review
- Increased oxygenation is associated with myocardial inflammation and adverse regional remodeling after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.European radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the longitudinal changes of microvascular function in different myocardial regions after myocardial infarction (MI) using myocardial blood flow derived by dynamic CT perfusion (CTP-MBF), and compare CTP-MBF with the results of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and histopathology.
methodsThe CTP scanning was performed in a MI porcine model 1 day (n = 15), 7 days (n = 10), and 3 months (n = 5) following induction surgery. CTP-MBF was measured in the infarcted myocardium, penumbra, and remote myocardium, respectively. CMR perfusion and histopathology were performed for validation.
resultsFrom baseline to follow-up scans, CTP-MBF presented a stepwise increase in the infarcted myocardium (68.51 ± 11.04 vs. 86.73 ± 13.32 vs. 109.53 ± 26.64 ml/100 ml/min, p = 0.001) and the penumbra (104.92 ± 29.29 vs. 120.32 ± 24.74 vs. 183.01 ± 57.98 ml/100 ml/min, p = 0.008), but not in the remote myocardium (150.05 ± 35.70 vs. 166.66 ± 38.17 vs. 195.36 ± 49.64 ml/100 ml/min, p = 0.120). The CTP-MBF correlated with max slope (r = 0.584, p < 0.001), max signal intensity (r = 0.357, p < 0.001), and time to max (r = - 0.378, p < 0.001) by CMR perfusion. Moreover, CTP-MBF defined the infarcted myocardium on triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining (AUC: 0.810, p < 0.001) and correlated with microvascular density on CD31 staining (r = 0.561, p = 0.002).
conclusionCTP-MBF could quantify the longitudinal changes of microvascular function in different regions of the post-MI myocardium, which demonstrates good agreement with contemporary CMR and histopathological findings. KEY POINTS: • The CT perfusion-based myocardial blood flow (CTP-MBF) could quantify the microvascular impairment in different myocardial regions after myocardial infarction (MI) and track its recovery over time. • The assessment of CTP-MBF is in good agreement with contemporary cardiac MRI and histopathological findings, which potentially facilitates a rapid approach for pathophysiological insights following MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.