ArticleJAMA network open2020
Incidence, Persistence, and Remission Rates of Insomnia Over 5 Years.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
109 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Long-term use of dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Pooled it
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation for chronic insomnia: a meta-analytic evaluation of sleep restoration and safety in adults.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- The "efficacy window" phenomenon of daridorexant in insomnia treatment: a dose-dependent time-course meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Global perspectives on the Sleep Condition Indicator for DSM-5 insomnia disorder: a COSMIN and STARD systematic review of psychometric and diagnostic performance.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of insomnia: a systematic literature review-based analysis.Sleep medicine reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Inadequate sleep increases stroke risk: evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis of incidence and mortality.GeroScience · 2025Pooled it
- Acupuncture for chronic insomnia disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Esketamine improves postoperative sleep quality in thoracic surgery patients with preoperative sleep disturbance: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of low-dose amitriptyline and mirtazapine in patients with insomnia disorder and sleep maintenance problems: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in general practice (DREAMING).The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Trial
- Effects of nurse-led brief behavioral treatment for insomnia in adults: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024Trial
- Comparing sleep measures in cancer survivors: self-reported sleep diary versus objective wearable sleep tracker.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Trial
- Effect of Psychological and Medication Therapies for Insomnia on Daytime Functions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- How Does E-mail-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Work for Young Adults (18-28 Years) with Insomnia? Mediators of Changes in Insomnia, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Can an E-Mail-Delivered CBT for Insomnia Validated in the West Be Effective in the East? A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Self-efficacy in Insomnia Symptom Management after Digital CBT-I Mediates Insomnia Severity during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sleep medicineTrial
- Differences in insomnia-related factors between working-age and older adults: A comparison of nocturnal and daytime symptoms.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- Insomnia and stroke risk: A systematic review with meta-analysis of analytical observational studies and mendelian randomization studies.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- Persistent Sleep Disturbance Following Pandemic Lockdowns: Longitudinal Findings From the UK COVID-19 Symptom Study Biobank.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Comparison of Insomnia Risk between Spironolactone and Esaxerenone in Individuals with Hypertension.JMA journal · 2026Article
49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Insomnia is a significant public health problem, but there is little information on its natural history. Objective: To assess the incidence, persistence, and remission rates of insomnia over a 5-year naturalistic follow-up period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included participants with and without sleep problems selected from the adult population in Canada from August 2007 to June 2014. Participants completed an annual survey about their sleep and health status for 5 consecutive years. Exposure: Using validated algorithms, participants were classified at each assessment as being good sleepers (n = 1717), having an insomnia disorder (n = 538), or having subsyndromal insomnia (n = 818). Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival analyses were used to derive incidence rates of new insomnia among the subgroup of good sleepers at baseline and persistence and remission rates among those with insomnia at baseline. Sleep trajectories were examined by looking at year-person transitions between each consecutive year summed over the 5-year follow-up period. All inferential analyses were weighted according to normalized sampling weights. Results: The sample included 3073 adults (mean [SD] age, 48.1 [15.0] years; range, 18.0-95.0 years; 1910 [62.2%] female). Overall, 13.9% (95% CI, 11.0%-17. 5%) of initial good sleepers developed an insomnia syndrome during the 5-year follow-up period, and incidence rates were higher among women than among men (17.6% [95% CI, 13.6%-22.7%] vs 10.1% [95% CI, 6.6%-15.3%; χ2 = 4.43; P = .03). A total of 37.5% (95% CI, 32.6%-42.5%) of participants with insomnia at baseline reported insomnia persisting at each of the 5 annual follow-up times. For subsyndromal insomnia, rates were 62.5% at 1 year to 26.5% at 5 years. For syndromal insomnia, rates were 86.0% at 1 year to 59.1% at 5 years. Conversely, remission rates among those with subsyndromal insomnia were almost double the rates among those with an insomnia syndrome at 1 year (37.5% [95% CI, 31.7%-44.0%] vs 14.0% [95% CI, 9.3%-20.8%]), 3 years (62.7% [95% CI, 56.7%-68.7%] vs 27.6% [95% CI, 20.9%-35.9%]), and 5 years (73.6% [95% CI, 68.0%-78.9%%] vs 40.9% [95% CI, 32.7%-50.4%]). Yearly trajectories showed that individuals who were good sleepers at baseline were 4.2 (95% CI, 3.51-4.89) times more likely to stay good sleepers in the subsequent year, but once they developed insomnia, they were equally likely to report symptoms (47% probability) than to return to a good sleeper status (53% probability) 1 year later. Similarly, those with an insomnia syndrome at any given assessment were more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.19-2.60) to remain in that status (persistence) than to improve (remittance) at the next assessment; even among those who improved, the odds of relapse were greater (adjusted odds ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.23-3.37) than those to improve in the following year. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that insomnia is often a persistent condition. Considering the long-term adverse outcomes associated with persistent insomnia, these findings may have important implication for the prognosis and management of insomnia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.