Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33156126›Full record

ArticleInvestigative radiology2021

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in (Future) Cancer Staging: Note the Nodes.

Tom W J Scheenen, Patrik Zamecnik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic performance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tom W J Scheenen
Patrik ZamecnikFrom the Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging · DERadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence or absence of lymph node metastases is a very important prognostic factor in patients with solid tumors. Current invasive and noninvasive diagnostic methods for N-staging like lymph node dissection, morphologic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography-computed tomography have significant limitations because of technical, biological, or anatomical reasons. Therefore, there is a great clinical need for more precise, reliable, and noninvasive N-staging in patients with solid tumors. Using ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of ironoxide (USPIO)-enhanced MRI offers noninvasive diagnostic possibilities for N-staging of different types of cancer, including the 4 examples given in this work (head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, rectal cancer, and prostate cancer). The excellent soft tissue contrast of MRI and an USPIO-based differentiation of metastatic versus nonmetastatic lymph nodes can enable more precise therapy and, therefore, fewer side effects, essentially in cancer patients in oligometastatic disease stage. By discussing 3 important questions in this article, we explain why lymph node staging is so important, why the timing for more accurate N-staging is right, and how it can be done with MRI. We illustrate this with the newest developments in magnetic resonance methodology enabling the use of USPIO-enhanced MRI at ultrahigh magnetic field strength and in moving parts of the body like upper abdomen or mediastinum. For prostate cancer, a comparison with radionuclide tracers connected to prostate specific membrane antigen is made. Under consideration also is the use of MRI for improvement of ex vivo cancer diagnostics. Further scientific and clinical development is needed to assess the accuracy of USPIO-enhanced MRI of detecting small metastatic deposits for different cancer types in different anatomical locations and to broaden the indications for the use of (USPIO-enhanced) MRI in lymph node imaging in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID33156126
PMCPMC7722468
OpenAlexW3094674482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.