Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155792›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021

Imaging modalities used in diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Takayasu’s arteritis

Ayşe Bahar Keleşoğlu Dinçer, Levent Kılıç, Abdulsamet Erden, Umut Kalyoncu, Tuncay Hazirolan, Sedat Kiraz, Ömer KaradaĞ

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayşe Bahar Keleşoğlu DinçerDepartment of Internal Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8810-2869
Levent KılıçDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1064-9690
Abdulsamet ErdenDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8084-2018
Umut KalyoncuDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-7129-2109
Tuncay HazirolanDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0620-2140
Sedat KirazDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-2802-6061
Ömer KaradaĞDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4922-8770
Hacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Takayasu’s arteritis (TA) is a rare, large-vessel vasculitis of unknown etiology, affecting aortic arch, and its main branches. Noninvasive imaging methods are frequently used in diagnosis and follow-up in Takayasu’s arteritis. Studies investigating optimal timing of follow up imaging are rare. This study is aimed to investigate the radiologic changes in vascular involvements of Takayasu’s arteritis patients one year after diagnosis. Materials and methods: Database of our Vasculitis Center was analyzed retrospectively and 97 patients were included into the study. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and therapeutic findings of patients were recorded. Patients with follow-up imaging after approximately one year of diagnosis were recruited into further analysis. Radiological changes and the effect of different immunosuppressive agents on vascular involvements were investigated. Results: Mean age and disease duration of patients were 43.0 and 9.0 years. The most commonly used imaging methods/modalities for the diagnosis of TA were computer tomography-angiography (CT-Ang) (58.8%), magnetic resonance-angiography (MR-Ang) (29.9%), and doppler ultrasonography (11.3%). Subclavian and common carotid arteries were the most frequently involved vessels. Fifty-three patients underwent follow-up imaging after one year of diagnosis and, in 64% of patients, same imaging method had been used. MR- Ang (62.3%) and CT-Ang (35.9%) were the most preferred follow-up imaging studies. Sixty-eight percent of patients had stable vascular involvement, 28% had progression, and 4% had regression. No difference was found in radiological changes regarding patients with usage of different immunosuppressive agents (P = 0.634). There was no association between the change in serum acute phase reactants and radiological disease activity. Conclusion: The most commonly used imaging modality for the diagnosis of TA was CT-Ang, whereas MR-Ang was the most preferred for follow-up. Almost 30% of TA patients in our Vasculitis Center had progression at around one year concordant with previous literature. A follow-up imaging at around one year of treatment seems feasible in management of TA.

Indexed as

AftercareComputed Tomography AngiographyMagnetic Resonance AngiographyTakayasu ArteritisAorta, ThoracicBrachiocephalic TrunkCarotid ArteriesFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTurkeyImmunosuppressive Agentscomputer tomography angiographyconventional angiographydoppler ultrasonographymagnetic resonance angiographypositron-emission tomographyTakayasu’s arteritis

Identifiers

PMID33155792
PMCPMC7991884
OpenAlexW3096367855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.