Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155754›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2020

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the presence of large nodal mass are independent predictors of early response: A subanalysis of the prospective phase II PET-2-adapted HD0607 trial.

Alessandra Romano, Chiara Pavoni, Francesco Di Raimondo, Corrado Tarella, Simonetta Viviani, Andrea Rossi, Caterina Patti, Marco Picardi, Maria Cantonetti, Giorgio La Nasa and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra RomanoDipartimento di Specialità medico-Chirurgiche, CHIRMED, Sezione di Ematologia, Università degli studi di Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-4433
Chiara PavoniEmatologia, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Francesco Di RaimondoDipartimento di Specialità medico-Chirurgiche, CHIRMED, Sezione di Ematologia, Università degli studi di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Corrado TarellaOnco-Hematology Unit, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.
Simonetta VivianiEmatologia e onco-ematologia pediatrica, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Andrea RossiEmatologia, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Caterina PattiEmatologia, Azienda Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.
Marco PicardiEmatologia, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Maria CantonettiOncoematologia, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Giorgio La NasaEmatologia, Ospedale R.Binaghi, Cagliari, Italy.
Livio TrentinEmatologia Dipartimento di Medicina, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Silvia BolisEmatologia, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Valerio ZoliEmatologia, Ospedale S. Camillo, Roma, Italy.
Paolo GavarottiEmatologia Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Italy.
Paolo CorradiniDipartimento di oncologia-ematologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Michele CimminielloDivisione Universitaria di Ematologia, Ospedale San Carlo, Potenza, Italy.
Corrado SchiavottoEmatologia, Presidio Ospedaliero S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy.
Guido ParvisDivisione Universitaria Medicina Interna, AO San Luigi, Orbassano, Italy.
Roberta ZanottiDivisione di Medicina, Unità di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Guido GiniDivisione Universitaria di Ematologia, Nuovo Ospedale Torrette, Ancona, Italy.
Andrés J M FerreriUnità di Ricerca Clinica Linfomi, IRCSS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Piera VieroEmatologia, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Mestre, Italy.
Stephane ChauvieMedicina Nucleare Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
Alberto BiggiMedicina Nucleare Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
Alessandro Massimo GianniOnco-Hematology Unit, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GallaminiDepartment recherch e innovation et statistique, Centre A. Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Alessandro RambaldiEmatologia, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
University of Milan · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITUniversity of Catania · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITOspedale degli Infermi · ITOspedale dell' Angelo · ITOspedale San Carlo · ITOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITOspedale Vincenzo Cervello · ITOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITPresidio Ospedaliero · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) can reflect both the myeloid dysfunction and T-cell immune suppression and have prognostic significance.

methodsIn 771 newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients we evaluated the baseline values of NLR and LMR as predictors of clinical outcome. According to the multicenter prospective phase II GITIL-HD0607 trial, all patients received two ABVD courses and if PET-2 negative received four additional ABVD cycles while if PET-2-positive patients were randomized to either BEACOPP escalated (Be) plus BEACOPP baseline (Bb) (4 + 4 courses) or Be + Bb (4 + 4) and Rituximab. PET scans were centrally reviewed by an expert panel by Blinded Independent Central Review.

resultsHigher NLR and lower LMR were associated with a PET-2 positivity and failure to achieve long-term disease control, respectively. By univariate and multivariate analysis, large nodal mass (>7 cm), IPS ≥ 3, NLR > 6 were strong independent predictors of early PET-2 response after ABVD. Only NLR > 6 and IPS ≥ 3 were strong independent predictors of outcome at diagnosis; however, when PET-2 status was added, only PET-2-positive status and IPS ≥ 3 were independent predictors of PFS. Focusing on PET-2-negative patients, those with NLR > 6 had an inferior 3-year PFS compared to patients with NLR ≤ 6 (84% vs 89% months, P = .03).

conclusionIn advanced-stage HL patients treated with a PET-2-driven strategy, IPS ≥ 3 and NLR > 6 are independent predictors of outcome at diagnosis while the presence of large nodal mass, IPS ≥ 3, and NLR > 6 at diagnosis are independent predictors of early ABVD response.

Indexed as

LymphocytesNeutrophilsPositron-Emission TomographyAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHodgkin DiseaseHumansItalyLymph NodesLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Stagingbiomarkershodgkin lymphomaneutrophil to lymphocyte ratioPET-2

Identifiers

PMID33155754
PMCPMC7724487
OpenAlexW3097061325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.