Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155621›Full record

ReviewThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2020

In the quest of a Standard Index of Intrinsic Capacity. A Critical Literature Review.

E Gonzalez-Bautista, S Andrieu, L M Gutiérrez-Robledo, R E García-Chanes, P de Souto Barreto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Intrinsic Capacity, Polygenic Risk Score, and Risk of Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E Gonzalez-BautistaEmmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista, Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, France, emmanuel.scout@gmail.com.
S Andrieu
L M Gutiérrez-Robledo
R E García-Chanes
P de Souto Barreto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntrinsic capacity is a composite of five domains that summarizes the physical and mental capacities of an individual. Intrinsic capacity is increasing in relevance for adapting health systems to population ageing. Therefore, our objective was to analyse how intrinsic capacity has been assessed in older adults and if these measurements have been validated, as an initial step towards the construction of a standard intrinsic capacity index.

designNarrative review with electronic searches performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases, including the studies which used the term "intrinsic capacity" in the context of human ageing and health. The full text was then accessed to select studies with at least one operationalised domain of intrinsic capacity. We also looked for information on the validity and reliability of the reported measures of intrinsic capacity.

resultsWe included ten articles reporting a quantitative measurement of intrinsic capacity. There were two intrinsic capacity scores which combined retrospective data on the intrinsic capacity domains sub-scores, with low concordance among tests chosen to measure each domain. Two studies reported on reliability and validity of the IC scores. The main gaps in the construction and validation process were a) analysis undertaken with each domain separately rather than for the construct of intrinsic capacity, b) lack of a clear conceptual and operational definition of the vitality domain, c) summary score that depends upon the distribution of the study sample.

conclusionFurther validation of the intrinsic capacity concept is needed, together with more robust approaches to measure it. A standard index of IC has not been validated for translation into clinical or research purposes.

Indexed as

Reference StandardsFemaleHumansMalePublic HealthReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesHealthy ageingindex validationintrinsic capacityphysical function

Identifiers

PMID33155621
PMCPMC12280598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.