Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155353›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989)2021

Chronic histiocytic intervillositis: A breakdown in immune tolerance comparable to allograft rejection?

Chloe A Brady, Charlotte Williams, Megan C Sharps, Amena Shelleh, Gauri Batra, Alexander E P Heazell, Ian P Crocker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Understanding a Potential Role for the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chloe A BradyTommy's Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7671-2966
Charlotte WilliamsTommy's Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Megan C SharpsTommy's Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7566-8246
Amena ShellehSt Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Gauri BatraPaediatric Histopathology, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Alexander E P HeazellTommy's Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4303-7845
Ian P CrockerTommy's Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4791-725X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N010892/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHI) is a pregnancy disorder characterized by infiltration of maternal macrophages into the intervillous space of the human placenta, often with accompanying perivillous fibrin deposition. CHI is associated strongly with foetal growth restriction and increased risk of miscarriage and stillbirth. Although rare, affecting 6 in every 10 000 pregnancies beyond 12 weeks' gestation, the rate of recurrence is high at 25%-100%. To date, diagnosis of CHI can only be made post-delivery upon examination of the placenta due to a lack of diagnostic biomarkers, and criteria vary across publications. No treatment options have shown proven efficacy, and CHI remains a serious obstetric conundrum. Although its underlying aetiology is unclear, due to the presence of maternal macrophages and the reported increased incidence in women with autoimmune disease, CHI is hypothesized to be an inappropriate immune response to the semi-allogeneic foetus. Given this lack of understanding, treatment approaches remain experimental with limited rationale. However, there is recent evidence that immunosuppression and antithrombotic therapies may be effective in preventing recurrence of associated adverse pregnancy outcomes. With similarities noted between the pathological features of CHI and acute rejection of solid organ transplants, further investigation of this hypothesis may provide a basis for tackling CHI and other immune-related placental conditions. This review will explore parallels between CHI and allograft rejection and identify areas requiring further confirmation and exploitation of this comparison.

Indexed as

AllograftsAutoimmune DiseasesChorionic VilliChronic DiseaseFemaleGraft RejectionHistiocytesHumansImmune ToleranceMaternal ExposurePlacenta DiseasesPregnancyPregnancy Complicationsgraft rejectionHLAmacrophagesmiscarriageplacentapregnancystillbirth

Identifiers

PMID33155353
PMCPMC7988544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.