Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155270›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2021

Health Heterogeneity in Older Adults: Exploration in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Quoc Dinh Nguyen, Erica M Moodie, Marie-France Forget, Philippe Desmarais, Mark R Keezer, Christina Wolfson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quoc Dinh NguyenDivision of Geriatrics, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-2597
Erica M MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Marie-France ForgetDivision of Geriatrics, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1102-1750
Philippe DesmaraisDivision of Geriatrics, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Mark R KeezerInnovation Hub, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Christina WolfsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

CIHR LSA 94473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA widely held dictum in aging research is that heterogeneity in health increases with age, but the basis for this claim has not been fully investigated. We examined heterogeneity at different ages across health characteristics to describe variation and trends; we investigated the comparative importance of between-age versus within-age heterogeneity.

designThis was a cohort study.

settingCommunity-dwelling older adults.

participantsA total of 30,097 adults aged 45 to 86 years, from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, were included. MEASUREMENTS: Thirty-four health characteristics in eight domains (physical measures, vital signs, physiological measures, physical performance, function/disability, chronic conditions, frailty, laboratory values) were assessed cross-sectionally. We used regression models to examine heterogeneity in health characteristics (using absolute deviation) and domains (using effective variance) in relation to age. Comparison between between-age and within-age heterogeneity was quantified by estimating the age threshold at which the former exceeds the latter.

resultsOf the 34 health characteristics, 17 showed increased heterogeneity, 8 decreased, and 9 no association with age. The associations between heterogeneity and age increased generally but were nonlinear for most domains and nonmonotonic for some. We observed peak heterogeneity at approximately 70 years. Between-age heterogeneity, compared with within-age heterogeneity, was most important for forced expiratory volume in 1 second and grip strength but varied across characteristics.

conclusionOverall health heterogeneity increases with age but does not uniformly increase across all variables and domains. Heterogeneity in aging reinforces the need for geriatric assessment and personalized care, depending on which health characteristics are assessed, their measurement properties, and their referent group. Our findings suggest further research to develop improved single-dimension and multidimensional instruments, as well as specific vital and laboratory reference ranges for older adults.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgingCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentGeriatricsHumansIndependent LivingLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Functional PerformanceReference ValuesCLSAheterogeneitymeasurementvariability

Identifiers

PMID33155270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.