ArticleRadiological physics and technology2020
Systolic modified Look-Locker inversion recovery myocardial T1 mapping improves the accuracy of T1 and extracellular volume fraction measurements of patients with high heart rate or atrial fibrillation.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical challenges in establishing local native T1 reference ranges in cardiac MRI: a critical review.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- CMR T1 and T2 mapping and extracellular volume quantification in systolic phase produces superior image quality with less motion artifacts and equal mapping values compared to conventional diastolic mapping.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- The Road Toward Reproducibility of Parametric Mapping of the Heart: A Technical Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image data for T1 mapping are generally acquired during mid-diastole period. However, T1 mapping tends to fail for patients with high heart rate or atrial fibrillation because of short or irregular R-R interval. Focusing on the evidence that the timing of systole is more stable than that of diastole from the R wave, we compared systolic T1 mapping with conventional diastolic T1 mapping for all participants (n = 58) by visual scoring of T1 calculation error. The systolic scores were significantly better than the diastolic scores (p < 0.05). This advantage of the systolic scores was confirmed selectively for patients with atrial fibrillation (p < 0.05, n = 19). The successful number of nonrigid image registration alignment for extracellular volume fraction (ECV) analysis also increased significantly for systolic images compared with diastolic images (p < 0.05). Thus, systolic T1 mapping improves the accuracy of T1 values and ECV analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33155177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.