Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155148›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2021

Management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis. A multidisciplinary review and position paper.

R Nascimbeni, A Amato, R Cirocchi, A Serventi, A Laghi, M Bellini, G Tellan, M Zago, C Scarpignato, G A Binda

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. C-reactive protein and digestive pathologies: A narrative review for daily clinical use.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Laparoscopic surgery for trans-anal barotrauma: a case report.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part II.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Antimicrobial Challenge in Acute Care Surgery.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. State-of-the-art surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

R NascimbeniDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25124, Brescia, Italy. riccardo.nascimbeni@unibs.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3408-0566
A AmatoUnit of Coloproctology, Department of Surgery, Borea Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
R CirocchiDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.
A ServentiDepartment of Surgery, Galliano Hospital, Acqui Terme, Italy.
A LaghiDepartment of Surgical-Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
M BelliniGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
G TellanDepartment of Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Clinical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
M ZagoDepartment of Robotic and Emergency Surgery, Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
C ScarpignatoDepartment of Health Sciences, United Campus of Malta, Msida, Malta.
G A BindaGeneral Surgery, Biomedical Institute, Genoa, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAlessandro Manzoni Hospital · ITChinese University of Hong Kong · HKOspedale di Sanremo · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perforated diverticulitis is an emergent clinical condition and its management is challenging and still debated. The aim of this position paper was to critically review the available evidence on the management of perforated diverticulitis and generalized peritonitis in order to provide evidence-based suggestions for a management strategy. Four Italian scientific societies (SICCR, SICUT, SIRM, AIGO), selected experts who identified 5 clinically relevant topics in the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis that would benefit from a multidisciplinary review. The following 5 issues were tackled: 1) Criteria to decide between conservative and surgical treatment in case of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis; 2) Criteria or scoring system to choose the most appropriate surgical option when diffuse peritonitis is confirmed 3); The appropriate surgical procedure in hemodynamically stable or stabilized patients with diffuse peritonitis; 4) The appropriate surgical procedure for patients with generalized peritonitis and septic shock and 5) Optimal medical therapy in patients with generalized peritonitis from diverticular perforation before and after surgery. In perforated diverticulitis surgery is indicated in case of diffuse peritonitis or failure of conservative management and the decision to operate is not based on the presence of extraluminal air. If diffuse peritonitis is confirmed the choice of surgical technique is based on intraoperative findings and the presence or risk of severe septic shock. Further prognostic factors to consider are physiological derangement, age, comorbidities, and immune status. In hemodynamically stable patients, emergency laparoscopy has benefits over open surgery. Options include resection and anastomosis, Hartmann's procedure or laparoscopic lavage. In generalized peritonitis with septic shock, an open surgical approach is preferred. Non-restorative resection and/or damage control surgery appear to be the only viable options, depending on the severity of hemodynamic instability. Multidisciplinary medical management should be applied with the main aims of controlling infection, relieving postoperative pain and preventing and/or treating postoperative ileus. In conclusion, the complexity and diversity of patients with diverticular perforation and diffuse peritonitis requires a personalized strategy, involving a thorough classification of physiological derangement, staging of intra-abdominal infection and choice of the most appropriate surgical procedure.

Indexed as

DiverticulitisDiverticulitis, ColonicIntestinal PerforationLaparoscopyPeritonitisAnastomosis, SurgicalColostomyHumansItalyAcute diverticulitisDiffuse peritonitisDiverticular diseaseSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID33155148
PMCPMC7884367
OpenAlexW3096287838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.