Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33155108›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Drug hypersensitivity in children: a retrospective analysis of 101 pharmacovigilance reports.

Maria Katsogiannou, Ania Carsin, Julie Mazenq, Jean-Christophe Dubus, Marie-José Gervoise-Boyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria KatsogiannouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Saint Joseph, FR-13008, Marseille, France.
Ania CarsinDepartment of Pediatrics, Hôpital Saint Joseph, FR-13008, Marseille, France.
Julie MazenqPediatric Pulmonology, Hôpital Timone Enfants and Aix-Marseille University, IRD, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée-Infection, FR-13385, Marseille, France.
Jean-Christophe DubusPediatric Pulmonology, Hôpital Timone Enfants and Aix-Marseille University, IRD, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée-Infection, FR-13385, Marseille, France.
Marie-José Gervoise-BoyerDepartment of Medicine and Biology of Reproduction, Hôpital Saint Joseph, 26 Boulevard de Louvain, FR-13008, Marseille, France. mboyer@hopital-saint-joseph.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-094X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to describe and discuss management of recent cases of drug hypersensitivity in children reported in a pharmacovigilance center. Two pediatric allergy units conducted a collaborative retrospective analysis of 101 adverse drug reactions reported to a regional pharmacovigilance center between January 2016 and July 2019. Time lapse between hypersensitivity reaction onset and allergy consultation varied from 1 month to 12 years. Sixty-two patients (61.4%) presented with immediate reactions, 11 (10.9%) with non-immediate reactions, and 28 (27.7%) had reactions impossible to classify through medical interview. Overall, 92 children (91%) were explored for simultaneously administered drugs. All 113 prick tests were negative, and 2 were uncertain. Among 108 intradermal tests, 2 were positive to penicillin and to an iodinated contrast medium, 105 were negative, and 1 was uncertain. Overall, 129 drug provocation tests were proposed. Nine provocation tests among 80 were positive (11.25%): 6 to penicillin, 1 to sulfonamide antibiotics, and 2 to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; the remaining 71 were negative. No severe reaction was observed during these tests. Finally, drug allergy was only retained in 11 reported cases (10.9%).Conclusion: These pharmacovigilance reports show the difficulty in defining drug allergy in children only by anamnesis, and that explorations, particularly provocation tests, should take place at a reasonable time lapse after drug hypersensitivity reaction onset. What is Known: • True drug allergy is rarely observed in children. • Absence of full workup leads to falsely labeling children as "allergic." What is New: • Short time lapse between hypersensitivity onset and consultation improves classification of pediatric allergy. • Timely allergy consultations are essential, and tests are useful to confirm or exclude pediatric allergy.

Indexed as

Drug HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildHumansPenicillinsPharmacovigilanceRetrospective StudiesSkin TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillinsAllergyDrug adverse reactionDrug provocation testsDrug safetyPediatricsSkin tests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.