ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022
An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A flexible framework for robust and efficient Mendelian randomization with debiasing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A More Robust Approach to Multivariable Mendelian Randomization.Biometrika · 2025Article
- Uncovering causal gene-tissue pairs and variants through a multivariate TWAS controlling for infinitesimal effects.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Uncovering causal gene-tissue pairs and variants: A multivariable TWAS method controlling for infinitesimal effects.Research square · 2024Article
- Uncovering causal gene-tissue pairs and variants: A multivariable TWAS method controlling for infinitesimal effects.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- A novel multivariable Mendelian randomization framework to disentangle highly correlated exposures with application to metabolomics.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Mendelian randomization.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Article
- Statistical methods for Mendelian randomization in genome-wide association studies: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Pleiotropy robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Valid estimation of a causal effect using instrumental variables requires that all of the instruments are independent of the outcome conditional on the risk factor of interest and any confounders. In Mendelian randomization studies with large numbers of genetic variants used as instruments, it is unlikely that this condition will be met. Any given genetic variant could be associated with a large number of traits, all of which represent potential pathways to the outcome which bypass the risk factor of interest. Such pleiotropy can be accounted for using standard multivariable Mendelian randomization with all possible pleiotropic traits included as covariates. However, the estimator obtained in this way will be inefficient if some of the covariates do not truly sit on pleiotropic pathways to the outcome. We present a method that uses regularization to identify which out of a set of potential covariates need to be accounted for in a Mendelian randomization analysis in order to produce an efficient and robust estimator of a causal effect. The method can be used in the case where individual-level data are not available and the analysis must rely on summary-level data only. It can be used where there are any number of potential pleiotropic covariates up to the number of genetic variants less one. We show the results of simulation studies that demonstrate the performance of the proposed regularization method in realistic settings. We also illustrate the method in an applied example which looks at the causal effect of urate plasma concentration on coronary heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.