ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2020
Comparison of the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on heart rate variability and heart rate turbulence in patients with percutaneous coronary interventions.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart Rate Variability and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Contributions of the heart rate turbulence method to risk stratification in patients after myocardial infarction: a review.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClopidogrel and ticagrelor are commonly used, antiplatelet agents. Ticagrelor has an effect of enhancing the plasma level of adenosine that may alter the autonomic function. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate turbulence (HRT).
methodsThirty subjects who performed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included in the randomized, crossover study. These patients were divided into two groups. Clopidogrel or ticagrelor was administered in two different testing sessions (1-month treatment for each session). In group 1, clopidogrel and ticagrelor treatment were used while in group 2, ticagrelor and clopidogrel treatment were used respectively. Three times rhythm Holter recording (baseline, 1st and 2nd month) was performed. The HRV (time domain and frequency domain) and HRT (turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS)) parameters were analyzed from the Holter recordings.
resultsAccording to baseline Holter recording, pNN50 (5.82 ± 5.83 vs 10.56 ± 8.28; p = 0.03) and HF(nu) (6.85 ± 9.33 vs 9.53 ± 7.41; p = 0.04) parameters were higher in group 2 than in group 1, while TO(0.004 ± 0.02 vs -0.01 ± 0.02; p = 0.01) parameter was positive and higher in group 1 than in group 2. In the second month, the LF/HF ratio (4.47 ± 2.43 vs 3.18 ± 2.45; p = 0.04) was higher in group 1 than in group 2. However, when the evaluation was done within the groups themselves, there were no statistically significant differences in HRV and HRT parameters obtained before and after clopidogrel and ticagrelor administration in group 1 and group 2.
conclusionTicagrelor and clopidogrel treatments did not have a significant effect on HRV and HRT parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.