Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154897›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2020

Impact of stent of ductus arteriosus and modified Blalock-Taussig shunt on pulmonary arteries growth and second-stage surgery in infants with ductus-dependent pulmonary circulation.

Bana Agha Nasser, Mesned Abdulrahman, Abdullah A L Qwaee, Ali Alakfash, Tageldein Mohamad, Mohamed S Kabbani

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Erratum: Stenting of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Meta-analysis and Literature Review.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Article
  10. Stenting of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Meta-analysis and Literature Review.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bana Agha NasserPediatric cardiac surgical intensive care, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Mesned AbdulrahmanPediatric cardiology department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A L QwaeePediatric cardiology department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlakfashPediatric cardiology department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Tageldein MohamadPediatric cardiac surgery, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed S KabbaniPediatric cardiac surgical intensive care, King Abdul Aziz Medical City, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saud Al-babtain Cardiac Centre · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDucts-dependent pulmonary circulation is spectrum of congenital heart diseases that need urgent intervention to augment pulmonary blood. Systemic to pulmonary shunt is the classical surgical management. Stenting of ductus arteriosus emerged in the last 2 decades as an alternative plausible intervention.

objectivesTo evaluate and compare the short and midterm effects of PDA stenting in compared to surgically placed shunt for augmentation of pulmonary blood flow looking to pulmonary artery (PA) branches growth, oxygen saturation and suitability for second stage repair.

methodsWe conducted this prospective study in Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit. Cases were divided into "stent group" and "surgical shunt" group. Results were compared between two groups regarding oxygen saturation, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care stay, mortality and morbidity. Growth of PA branches was assessed during follow up by echocardiograph. Nakata index score was calculated by angiogram before second stage surgery and was compared between both groups.

results43 patients were included. Forty-two cases were offered stent as initial management. 6/42 cases failed stenting (14%) and 3/42 (7%) required late BT shunt after PDA stenting. 10/43 cases ended up receiving BT shunt and were counted as "surgical shunt group". Stent group (33 cases) needed less mechanical ventilation (2.08 ± 0.65 vs.7.8 ± 4 days with p = 0.014), and less ICU stay compared with surgical shunt group (6.2 ± 1.02 vs. 14 ± 4.5 days, P = 0.009). Both groups achieved similar growth of pulmonary artery branches (p = 0.6 for Z score of left pulmonary artery and P = 0.8 for Z score for right pulmonary artery). Although "stent group" reached second stage surgery with lower O2 saturation 67.6 ± 4.6 vs. 80 ± 4.2 in "surgical shunt" group with P value = 0.0002). Majority of patients in both groups had some PA distortion and needed surgical reconstruction in main pulmonary artery or in its main branches during second stage repair. 3 cases (7.1%) died soon post stenting versus none in surgical shunt group (

conclusionsIn neonates with ductus-dependent pulmonary circulation PDA stenting can be introduced as safe first possible option to augment pulmonary blood flow with good outcome and suitable preparation for second stage palliation.

Indexed as

PDA stentPulmonary arteries growthSurgical aortopulmonary shunt

Identifiers

PMID33154897
PMCPMC7640615
OpenAlexW2972798428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.