Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154876›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

A Systematic Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Cutaneous Wounds.

Dean Malik, Joshua Luck, Oliver J Smith, Afshin Mosahebi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CELTCells · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dean MalikDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joshua LuckDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver J SmithDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Afshin MosahebiDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the regenerative potential of autologous fat. Adipose-derived stem cells, within the stromal vascular fraction of lipoaspirate samples, demonstrate anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and angiogenic properties. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of autologous fat therapies for wound healing, with an evaluation of the quality of evidence provided by the literature.

methodsFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to November 2018. We included all human studies where wounds were treated with lipotransfer, cell-assisted lipotransfer, stromal vascular fraction products, or isolated adipose-derived stem cells. Study screening and data extraction were performed by 2 authors. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

resultsThe search strategy returned 5027 citations. From these, 10 observational case series were included in the qualitative synthesis; there were no randomized controlled trials. Patient characteristics, wound etiology, and intervention type differed markedly between studies, precluding formal meta-analysis. Autologous fat grafting was associated with satisfactory wound healing in all studies with low complication rates. However, the quality of evidence was consistently very low.

conclusionsAutologous fat grafting is an emerging therapeutic option for challenging wounds, although there is insufficient evidence to conclusively demonstrate its effectiveness and adverse event profile. Based on the literature to date, it is unclear whether one type of autologous fat therapy is superior. Well-designed, blinded, prospective randomized controlled trials with adequate methodologic details and objective outcome measure reporting are essential. PROSPERO ID: CRD42017081499.

Identifiers

PMID33154876
PMCPMC7605858
OpenAlexW3028185448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.