ArticleOncology letters2020
Identification and preservation of stained non-sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery of fluorescent properties in mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection for tracing: application for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting axillary reverse mapping lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Lymphadenectomy in the treatment of sarcomas - indications and technique.Oncology reviews · 2024Review
- Indocyanine green combined with methylene blue versus methylene blue alone for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the first lymph nodes that receive lymphatic drainage from the breast. However, all stained lymph nodes are dissected as SLNs during surgery. The present study aimed to identify and preserve the stained non-SLNs and evaluate the safety during sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer. SLNB was performed with a methylene blue and indocyanine green double-tracer technique. The first lymph node, which was connected with lymphatic vessels from the breast, was designated as the true SLN. The lymph node that was directly connected with the output lymphatic duct of the SLN was defined as post-SLN (poSLN), whereas the stained poSLN was designated as non-SLN. Both the stained SLN and non-SLN were sent to the pathological department for definitive diagnosis. The present study demonstrated that intraoperative dissection of the lymphatic network could distinguish true SLNs and stained non-SLNs. The number of stained lymph nodes was time-dependent. Not all stained lymph nodes were real SLNs, whereas the poSLNs would be stained if the staining time interval was inappropriate. The data indicated that the poSLNs were negative for metastasis when the SLNs were negative for metastasis. Stained lymph nodes may contain non-SLNs in addition to SLNs. Resection of all stained lymph nodes is not recommended. To reduce the morbidity due to SLNB complications, the identification and preservation of stained non-SLNs during SLNB is feasible and warrants further study in the era of precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.