Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020
Multifocal ERG and Microperimetry Changes in Response to Ranibizumab Treatment of Neovascular AMD: Randomized Phase 2 Open-Label Study.
Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare monthly versus pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab injections in the treatment of exudative macular degeneration (AMD) while assessing the utility of microperimetry (MP) and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) testing when monitoring response to treatment.
methodsA randomized exploratory trial comparing the efficacy of monthly versus PRN dosing of ranibizumab (0.5 mg or 2.0 mg) for patients with exudative AMD over 12 months. High-resolution optical coherence tomography (HR-OCT) studies were used to guide PRN treatment and any cystic spaces or subretinal fluid prompted retreatment. Macular function was assessed using mean sensitivity on MP and N1-P1 response density on mfERG. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters and anatomic response assessed with central foveal thickness (CFT) using HR-OCT studies.
resultsThe 12-month study was completed by 43 patients in the PRN cohort and 33 patients in the monthly cohort. Mean BCVA improved by 6.0 ± 1.3 ETDRS letters in the PRN cohort compared to 7.3 ± 2.8 ETDRS letters in the monthly cohort (p=0.68). A reduction in mean CFT of 64.5 ± 13.3 and 96.3 ± 22.0 µm occurred in the PRN and monthly cohorts, respectively (p=0.22). Macular function assessed with mfERG decreased comparably in both the PRN and monthly cohorts (p=0.33). For all patients, average mean sensitivity significantly improved by 1.7 ± 0.5 dB (p<0.05) and N1-P1 response density significantly decreased by 0.52 ± 0.21 nV/deg
conclusionBoth PRN and monthly treatment of exudative AMD with ranibizumab improve visual function as assessed by BCVA and MP. Macular thickening also improved as demonstrated by HR-OCT findings. However, the decreased retinal function noted by mfERG suggests that some loss of retinal function still occurs despite effective treatment. These measures of visual function may be useful in assessing retinal health and response to treatment in future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.