Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154503›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2020

Palatal rugae morphology is associated with variation in tooth number.

Jessica Armstrong, Jadbinder Seehra, Manoharan Andiappan, Allan G Jones, Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Martyn T Cobourne

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Periodic pattern formation during embryonic development.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica ArmstrongDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Craniofacial Development & Regeneration, King's College London, Floor 27, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Jadbinder SeehraDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Craniofacial Development & Regeneration, King's College London, Floor 27, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Manoharan AndiappanFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, London, UK.
Allan G JonesDepartment of Orthodontics, Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kingston, UK.
Spyridon N PapageorgiouClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martyn T CobourneDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Craniofacial Development & Regeneration, King's College London, Floor 27, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK. martyn.cobourne@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This observational study compared palatal rugae morphology in adolescent subjects with normal tooth number and tooth agenesis. Maxillary dental study casts were used to compare rugae number, length and shape. Each study group contained 60 subjects (30 females and 30 males) mean age 13.4 (SD, 1.55) in control and 13.56 (SD, 1.54) years in tooth agenesis groups (p = 0.576). Mean number of missing tooth units in the tooth agenesis group was 2.1. Mean number of primary rugae in the whole sample was 4.35 (SD, 0.98) on the right and 4.33 (SD, 0.92) on the left with no significant differences (p = 0.236 and p = 0.404, respectively). However, the number of secondary rugae on the left (p = 0.006) and fragmentary rugae on the right (p = 0.004) was significantly increased in the tooth agenesis group. The shape of left primary rugae 2 and 3 also differed between groups, tending towards a wavy pattern in the control group and curved in the tooth agenesis group (p = 0.012 and p = 0.004, respectively). In addition, primary rugae 3 was more convergent (p = 0.008) whilst left primary rugae 3 and 5 were orientated in an antero-posterior direction (p = 0.04 for both rugae) in the tooth agenesis group. Subgroup analysis also identified significant associations between patterns of tooth agenesis and rugae number, in addition to shape of primary rugae. The identification of significant differences in rugae pattern between subjects with normal tooth number and agenesis suggests potential commonality in signal pathway disruption during establishment of these structures.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnodontiaChildCohort StudiesDental Casting TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleModels, DentalPalate, Hard

Identifiers

PMID33154503
PMCPMC7645628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.