SynthesisScientific reports2020
Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stair negotiation following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of biomechanical outcomes.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of patellofemoral joint diseases on functional outcomes and prosthesis survival in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients under the age of 60 years provides excellent clinical outcomes and 10-year implant survival: a systematic review : A study performed by the Early Osteoarthritis group of ESSKA-European Knee Associates section.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of age on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- No difference in mobile and fixed bearing partial knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: a clinical trial.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Trial
- Knee Scores of Patients with Non-Lateral Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Mobile, Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Trial
- 'Wear advantage' of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a myth: Higher volumetric wear without reduced revision rates compared to the fixed-bearing design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Demographics and outcomes of unicondylar knee arthroplasty in Türkiye: a nationwide retrospective database study of eight thousand, five hundred and ninety cases.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Mobile-bearing or Fixed-bearing?The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of efficacy and cost-effectiveness between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Mobile Versus Fixed-Bearing in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Average 10-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Effect of anterior cruciate ligament integrity on the short- and mid-term effectiveness of mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- Long-term functional success and robust implant survival in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A case series with a mean follow-up of twenty two and a half years.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Unicompartmental knee replacement: controversies and technical considerations.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2024Review
- Risk of revision in UKA versus HTO: a nationwide propensity score-matched study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
- Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be either a fixed bearing (FB) or a mobile bearing (MB) construct with controversy as to which design is superior. This question is addressed with a systematic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Studies were reviewed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria developed in advance. We compared the differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the FB and MB UKAs. Analyses were performed with the Review Manager and STATA software. A total of 17 studies involving 2612 knees were included. No significant differences were presented between the FB and MB prostheses in clinical and radiological outcomes. However, it was evident that there were differences in the modes and timing of the failures, bearing dislocation led to earlier failures in the MB prosthesis, while the FB prosthesis failed later due to polyethylene wear. There was no evidence of publication bias using the incidence of revisions. There is no significant difference between the FB and MB UKAs; however, there are differences in the modes and timing of failures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.