ArticleScientific reports2020
Force-velocity profile during vertical jump cannot be assessed using only bodyweight jump and isometric maximal voluntary contraction tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Force-velocity profile based training to improve vertical jump performance a systematic review and meta analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Validity and reliability of "My Jump app" to assess vertical jump performance: a meta-analytic review.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Vertical Force-Velocity Profiling in Soccer: A Systematic Review of Evidence, Assumptions, and Limitations.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Biomechanical and neuromuscular adaptations in joint contributions during loaded countermovement jumps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Feasibility of the 2-point method to determine the load-velocity relationship variables during the countermovement jump exercise.Journal of sport and health science · 2023Article
- Force-Velocity Profiling in Club-Based Field Hockey Players: Analyzing the Relationships between Mechanical Characteristics, Sex, and Positional Demands.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2023Article
- The Validity of the 2-Point Method for Assessing the Force-Velocity Relationship of the Knee Flexors and Knee Extensors: The Relevance of Distant Force-Velocity Testing.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Effects of Different Loading Types on the Validity and Magnitude of Force-Velocity Relationship Parameters.Sports healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the two-point method of force-velocity (F-V) profiling of multi-joint human movements has been introduced and validated. In this study, we investigated the validity of estimating the jumping F-V profile using only bodyweight jump and isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) task. Participants (n = 30) performed 3 repetitions of squat (SJ) and counter-movement jumps (CMJ), each at loads that were progressively increased by 10 kg increments, with the number of loads depending on the individual's ability. Then, 3 isometric MVC trials were performed in 3 knee angles (30°, 60° and 90°). F-V profiling of SJ and CMJ were performed using the multiple-point method, the two-point method, and the novel Jump-MVC method. The results showed poor to fair validity of the novel Jump-MVC method for assessing jumping F-V profile (most ICC < 0.5, most CV > 10%, significant systematic bias present, and the presence of proportional bias). The exception was the estimation of theoretical maximal power, which was highly valid for both SJ and CMJ (ICC = 0.91-0.95; CV = 5.0-6.3%). In contrast, validity of the two-point method was excellent (all ICC > 0.90; CV = 2-6%). Although additional studies are needed, present results suggest that the F-V profiling of vertical jumps should be performed using the two-point method with distal loads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.