Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154444›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A multi-disciplinary comparison of great ape gut microbiota in a central African forest and European zoo.

Victor Narat, Katherine R Amato, Noémie Ranger, Maud Salmona, Séverine Mercier-Delarue, Stephanie Rupp, Philippe Ambata, Richard Njouom, François Simon, Tamara Giles-Vernick and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victor NaratEco-anthropologie, UMR7206 CNRS/MNHN/Université de Paris, Site du Musée de L'Homme, Paris, France.
Katherine R AmatoDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA.
Noémie RangerUniversité de Paris, Equipe INSIGHT, Inserm U976, 75010, Paris, France.
Maud SalmonaUniversité de Paris, Equipe INSIGHT, Inserm U976, 75010, Paris, France.
Séverine Mercier-DelarueUniversité de Paris, Equipe INSIGHT, Inserm U976, 75010, Paris, France.
Stephanie RuppDepartment of Anthropology, City University of New York - Lehman College, New York, NY, USA.
Philippe AmbataMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Richard NjouomCentre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.
François SimonUniversité de Paris, Equipe INSIGHT, Inserm U976, 75010, Paris, France.
Tamara Giles-VernickInstitut Pasteur, Anthropology and Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Paris, France. tamara.giles-vernick@pasteur.fr.
Jérôme LeGoffUniversité de Paris, Equipe INSIGHT, Inserm U976, 75010, Paris, France. jerome.le-goff@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparisons of mammalian gut microbiota across different environmental conditions shed light on the diversity and composition of gut bacteriome and suggest consequences for human and animal health. Gut bacteriome comparisons across different environments diverge in their results, showing no generalizable patterns linking habitat and dietary degradation with bacterial diversity. The challenge in drawing general conclusions from such studies lies in the broad terms describing diverse habitats ("wild", "captive", "pristine"). We conducted 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing to characterize intestinal microbiota of free-ranging sympatric chimpanzees and gorillas in southeastern Cameroon and sympatric chimpanzees and gorillas in a European zoo. We conducted participant-observation and semi-structured interviews among people living near these great apes to understand better their feeding habits and habitats. Unexpectedly, bacterial diversity (ASV, Faith PD and Shannon) was higher among zoo gorillas than among those in the Cameroonian forest, but zoo and Cameroonian chimpanzees showed no difference. Phylogeny was a strong driver of species-specific microbial composition. Surprisingly, zoo gorilla microbiota more closely resembled that of zoo chimpanzees than of Cameroonian gorillas. Zoo living conditions and dietary similarities may explain these results. We encourage multidisciplinary approach integrating environmental sampling and anthropological evaluation to characterize better diverse environmental conditions of such investigations.

Indexed as

DietAnimalsAnimals, WildAnimals, ZooCameroonFecesForestsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGorilla gorillaPan troglodytesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecies SpecificityRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33154444
PMCPMC7645722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.