Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154397›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

'Barcode fishing' for archival DNA from historical type material overcomes taxonomic hurdles, enabling the description of a new frog species.

Mark D Scherz, Safidy M Rasolonjatovo, Jörn Köhler, Loïs Rancilhac, Andolalao Rakotoarison, Achille P Raselimanana, Annemarie Ohler, Michaela Preick, Michael Hofreiter, Frank Glaw and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Buffered Lugol's Iodine Preserves DNA Fragment Lengths.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  5. Revision of the SubgenusAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mark D ScherzZoologisches Institut, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
Safidy M RasolonjatovoMention Zoologie et Biodiversité Animale, Université d'Antananarivo, BP 906, 101, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Jörn KöhlerHessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Friedensplatz 1, 64283, Darmstadt, Germany.
Loïs RancilhacZoologisches Institut, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
Andolalao RakotoarisonMention Zoologie et Biodiversité Animale, Université d'Antananarivo, BP 906, 101, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Achille P RaselimananaMention Zoologie et Biodiversité Animale, Université d'Antananarivo, BP 906, 101, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Annemarie OhlerMuseum National d'Histoire Naturelle, ISYEB, CNRS, SU, EPHE, UA, 57 Rue Cuvier, 75005, Paris, France.
Michaela PreickInstitut für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Michael HofreiterInstitut für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Frank GlawZoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany.
Miguel VencesZoologisches Institut, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany. m.vences@tu-braunschweig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxonomic progress is often hindered by intrinsic factors, such as morphologically cryptic species that require a broad suite of methods to distinguish, and extrinsic factors, such as uncertainties in the allocation of scientific names to species. These uncertainties can be due to a wide variety of factors, including old and poorly preserved type specimens (which contain only heavily degraded DNA or have lost important diagnostic characters), inappropriately chosen type specimens (e.g. juveniles without diagnostic characters) or poorly documented type specimens (with unprecise, incorrect, or missing locality data). Thanks to modern sequencing technologies it is now possible to overcome many such extrinsic factors by sequencing DNA from name-bearing type specimens of uncertain assignment and assigning these to known genetic lineages. Here, we apply this approach to frogs of the Mantidactylus ambreensis complex, which was recently shown to consist of two genetic lineages supported by concordant differentiation in mitochondrial and nuclear genes. These lineages co-occur on the Montagne d'Ambre Massif in northern Madagascar but appear to have diverged in allopatry. We use a recently published bait set based on three mitochondrial markers from all known Malagasy frog lineages to capture DNA sequences from the 127-year-old holotype of Mantidactylus ambreensis Mocquard, 1895. With the obtained sequences we are able to assign the name M. ambreensis to the lowland lineage, which is rather widespread in the rainforests of northern Madagascar, leaving the microendemic high-elevation lineage on Montagne d'Ambre in north Madagascar in need of description. We describe this species as Mantidactylus ambony sp. nov., differing from M. ambreensis in call parameters and a smaller body size. Thus, using target enrichment to obtain DNA sequence data from this old specimen, we were able to resolve the extrinsic (nomenclatural) hindrances to taxonomic resolution of this complex. We discuss the broad-scale versatility of this 'barcode fishing' approach, which can draw on the enormous success of global DNA barcoding initiatives to quickly and efficiently assign type specimens to lineages.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicPhylogenyAnimalsAnuraBody SizeGenetic MarkersMadagascarGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID33154397
PMCPMC7644772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.