Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154374›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Bryophytes are predicted to lag behind future climate change despite their high dispersal capacities.

F Zanatta, R Engler, F Collart, O Broennimann, R G Mateo, B Papp, J Muñoz, D Baurain, A Guisan, A Vanderpoorten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Range Dynamics of the MossPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Quo Vadis,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F ZanattaInstitute of Botany, University of Liège, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.
R EnglerVital-IT, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
F CollartInstitute of Botany, University of Liège, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-5848
O BroennimannDepartment of Ecology and Evolution (DEE), University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
R G MateoDepartment of Biology (Botánica), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-001X
B PappDepartment of Botany, Hungarian Natural History Museum, H-1431, Budapest, Hungary.
J MuñozReal Jardín Botánico (CSIC), E-28014, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9266-2268
D BaurainInBioS-PhytoSYSTEMS, Eukaryotic Phylogenomics, University of Liège, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2388-6185
A GuisanDepartment of Ecology and Evolution (DEE), University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
A VanderpoortenInstitute of Botany, University of Liège, B-4000, Liège, Belgium. a.vanderpoorten@uliege.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which species can balance out the loss of suitable habitats due to climate warming by shifting their ranges is an area of controversy. Here, we assess whether highly efficient wind-dispersed organisms like bryophytes can keep-up with projected shifts in their areas of suitable climate. Using a hybrid statistical-mechanistic approach accounting for spatial and temporal variations in both climatic and wind conditions, we simulate future migrations across Europe for 40 bryophyte species until 2050. The median ratios between predicted range loss vs expansion by 2050 across species and climate change scenarios range from 1.6 to 3.3 when only shifts in climatic suitability were considered, but increase to 34.7-96.8 when species dispersal abilities are added to our models. This highlights the importance of accounting for dispersal restrictions when projecting future distribution ranges and suggests that even highly dispersive organisms like bryophytes are not equipped to fully track the rates of ongoing climate change in the course of the next decades.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeBryophytaEcosystemEuropeExtinction, BiologicalForecastingModels, TheoreticalPlant DispersalWind

Identifiers

PMID33154374
PMCPMC7645420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.