Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154058›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: does the type of exercise influence the outcomes? Protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Marc-Olivier Dubé, François Desmeules, Jeremy Lewis, Jean-Sébastien Roy

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03892603 nacompletednot on this map

Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain: Does The Type of Exercise Influence Outcome? - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled123ConditionsShoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Injury, Rotator Cuff Tendinitis, Rotator Cuff Impingement SyndromeArmsStrengthening exercises program, Motor control exercises program, Education and advice
NCT07428070 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effectiveness of Contextually Enhanced Exercise Programs for Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Nisantasi UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled72ConditionsRotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff InjuriesArmsContextually Fixed Exercise Program, Contextually Enriched Personalized Exercise Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc-Olivier DubéDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-2982
François DesmeulesSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jeremy LewisSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Jean-Sébastien RoyDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada jean-sebastien.roy@fmed.ulaval.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLifetime prevalence of shoulder pain is 70%, and approximately 50% of people with shoulder pain will experience pain for more than a year. Rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is the most common shoulder condition and the main non-surgical intervention is exercise therapy. For approximately 30% of people with RCRSP, this approach does not lead to a significant reduction in symptoms. This may be due to an inappropriate dosage or choice of exercises. The aim of this investigation is to compare the short, mid and long-term effects, in terms of symptoms, functional limitations, kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising, of three different shoulder rehabilitation approaches (education, strengthening, motor control) in adults with RCRSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-blind (assessor), parallel-group, randomised clinical trial, 123 adults presenting with RCRSP will take part in a 12-week rehabilitation programme. They will be randomly assigned to one of three groups (education only, strengthening approach or motor control-focused approach). Abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, the primary outcome, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Brief Pain Inventory will evaluate symptoms and functional limitations, while Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing Scale will evaluate pain-related fear and catastrophising at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. Ultrasonographic acromiohumeral distances and tendon thickness will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks. Intervention groups will be compared on outcomes with intention-to-treat analyses using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance if the data are normally distributed or non-parametric analysis of longitudinal data if they are not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Sectorial Rehabilitation and Social Integration Research Ethics Committee of the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale Nationale (CIUSSS-CN). Results will be disseminated through international publications in peer-reviewed journals, in addition to international conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03892603; pre-results.

Indexed as

Rotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesAdultExercise TherapyHumansOntarioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicShoulder PainSingle-Blind Methodelbow & shouldermusculoskeletal disordersrehabilitation medicineshouldersports medicine

Identifiers

PMID33154058
PMCPMC7646354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.