Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154055›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Protocol for development and validation of a clinical prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.

Shamil D Cooray, Jacqueline A Boyle, Georgia Soldatos, Javier Zamora, Borja M Fernández Félix, John Allotey, Shakila Thangaratinam, Helena J Teede

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Update on Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shamil D CoorayMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6825-4440
Jacqueline A BoyleMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-1637
Georgia SoldatosMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Javier ZamoraCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4901-588X
Borja M Fernández FélixCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8798-019X
John AlloteyWHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4134-6246
Shakila ThangaratinamWHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4254-460X
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Helena.Teede@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-577X
Monash Health · AUCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGestational diabetes (GDM) is a common yet highly heterogeneous condition. The ability to calculate the absolute risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for an individual woman with GDM would allow preventative and therapeutic interventions to be delivered to women at high-risk, sparing women at low-risk from unnecessary care. The Prediction for Risk-Stratified care for women with GDM (PeRSonal GDM) study will develop, validate and evaluate the clinical utility of a prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We undertook formative research to conceptualise and design the prediction model. Informed by these findings, we will conduct a model development and validation study using a retrospective cohort design with participant data collected as part of routine clinical care across three hospitals. The study will include all pregnancies resulting in births from 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2018 coded for a diagnosis of GDM (estimated sample size 2430 pregnancies). We will use a temporal split-sample development and validation strategy. A multivariable logistic regression model will be fitted. The performance of this model will be assessed, and the validated model will also be evaluated using decision curve analysis. Finally, we will explore modes of model presentation suited to clinical use, including electronic risk calculators. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Monash Health (RES-19-0000713 L). We will disseminate results via presentations at scientific meetings and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: Systematic review proceeding this work was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019115223) and the study was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000915954); Pre-results.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalAustraliaFemaleHumansNew ZealandPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective Studiesdiabetes in pregnancyobstetricspublic health

Identifiers

PMID33154055
PMCPMC7646337
OpenAlexW3096829629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.