Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154054›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2020

Comparison of the pathways of care and life courses between first-time ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and STEMI with prior MI: findings from the OSCAR registry.

Laurie Fraticelli, Olivier Kleitz, Clément Claustre, Nicolas Eydoux, Alexandra Peiretti, Karim Tazarourte, Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz, Claude Dussart, Carlos El Khoury, RESCUe Research Group

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laurie FraticelliRESCUe-RESUVal network, Hospital Center Lucien Hussel, Vienne, France l.fraticelli@resuval.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2647-658X
Olivier KleitzRESCUe-RESUVal network, Hospital Center Lucien Hussel, Vienne, France.
Clément ClaustreRESCUe-RESUVal network, Hospital Center Lucien Hussel, Vienne, France.
Nicolas EydouxRESCUe-RESUVal network, Hospital Center Lucien Hussel, Vienne, France.
Alexandra PeirettiRESCUe-RESUVal network, Hospital Center Lucien Hussel, Vienne, France.
Karim TazarourteDepartment of Emergency Medicine and SAMU, Hospital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Eric Bonnefoy-CudrazCardiology intensive care unit, Hospital Louis Pradel, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Claude DussartLaboratory Systemic Health Care, EA 4129, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Carlos El KhouryHESPER EA 7425, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
RESCUe Research Group
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe hypothesised that patients having experienced one coronary event in their life were susceptible to present differences in their pathways of care and within 1 year of their life courses. We aimed to compare pathways between first-time ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and STEMI with prior myocardial infarction (MI).

designA retrospective observational study based on the Observatoire des Syndromes Coronariens Aigus du réseau RESCUe (OSCAR) registry collecting all suspected STEMI from 10 percutaneous coronary intervention centres in France.

settingAll patients with STEMI from 2013 to 2017 were included (N=6306 with 5423 first-time STEMI and 883 STEMI with prior MI). We provided a matching analysis by propensity score based on cardiovascular risk factors.

participantsWe defined first-time STEMI as STEMI occurring at the inclusion date, and STEMI with prior MI as STEMI with a history of MI prior to the inclusion date.

resultsPatients with first-time STEMI and patients with STEMI with prior MI were equally treated during hospitalisation and at discharge. At 12 months, patients with first-time STEMI had a lower adherence to BASIC treatment (ie, beta-blocker, antiplatelet therapy, statin and converting enzyme inhibitor) (48.11% vs 58.58%, p=0.0167), more frequently completed the cardiac rehabilitation programme (44.33% vs 31.72%, p=0.0029), more frequently changed their lifestyle behaviours; more frequently practiced daily physical activity (48.11% vs 35.82%, p=0.0043) and more frequently stopped smoking at admission (69.39% vs 55.00%, p=0.0524). The estimated mortality was higher for patients with STEMI with prior MI at 1 month (p=0.0100), 6 months (p=0.0500) and 1 year (p=0.0600).

conclusionsWe provided an exhaustive overview of the real-life clinical practice conditions of STEMI management. The patients with STEMI with prior MI presented an optimised use of prehospital resources, which was probably due to their previous experience, and showed a better adherence to drug therapy compared with patients with first-time STEMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (number 2 013 090 v0).

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionAgedFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomerecurrencerisk reduction behaviorsecondary preventionST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID33154054
PMCPMC7646338
OpenAlexW3096259904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.