Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154052›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Ultrasound imaging in patients with hip pain and suspected hip osteoarthritis: an inter-rater and intra-rater reliability study.

Stine Clausen, Søren Kjær, Ulrich Fredberg, Lene Terslev, Jan Hartvigsen, Bodil Arnbak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Spinopelvic fixation surgery in relation to the femoroacetabular impingement syndrome under the ultrasound.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stine ClausenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark sclausen@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-8632-4596
Søren KjærDiagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Ulrich FredbergDiagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Lene TerslevCopenhagen Center for Arthritis Research and Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jan HartvigsenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.
Bodil ArnbakDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKRegionshospitalet Silkeborg · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to asses (1) inter-rater and intrarater reliability of ultrasound imaging in patients with hip osteoarthritis, and (2) agreement between ultrasound and X-ray findings of hip osteoarthritis using validated Outcome Measures in Rheumatology ultrasound definitions for pathology.

designAn inter-rater and intrarater reliability study.

settingA single-centre study conducted at a regional hospital.

participants50 patients >39 years of age referred for radiography due to hip pain and suspected hip osteoarthritis were included. Exclusion criteria were previous hip surgery in the painful hip, suspected fracture or malignant changes in the hip.

interventionBilateral ultrasound examinations (n=92) were performed continuously by two experienced operators blinded to clinical information and other imaging findings. After 4-6 weeks, one operator reassessed the images. X-rays were assessed by a third imaging specialist. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater and intrarater reliability and agreement between ultrasound imaging and X-ray were assessed using Cohen's ordinal kappa statistics for binary categorical variables and weighted kappa for ordered categorical variables.

resultsKappa values (κ) for inter-rater reliability were 0.9 and 0.8 for hip effusion/synovitis and osteoarthritis grading, respectively. For acetabular and femoral osteophytes, femoral cartilage changes and labrum changes κ ranged from 0.4 to 0.7. Intrarater reliability had κ equal or higher compared with inter-rater reliability. Agreement between ultrasound and X-ray findings ranged from κ=0.2 to κ=0.5.

conclusionThis study demonstrated substantial to almost perfect reliability on the most common ultrasound findings related to hip osteoarthritis and osteoarthritis grading. Agreement on the grade of osteoarthritis between ultrasound and X-ray was moderate. Overall, these results support ultrasound imaging as a reliable tool in the assessment of hip osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, HipArthralgiaHumansObserver VariationPainReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographydiagnostic radiologyhiprheumatologyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID33154052
PMCPMC7646344
OpenAlexW3097649326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.