Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33154048›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Changing mortality trends in countries and cities of the UK: a population-based trend analysis.

David Walsh, Gerry McCartney, Jon Minton, Jane Parkinson, Deborah Shipton, Bruce Whyte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Political Economy of Health Inequality.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Parkrunners Are Slower and the Attendance Gender Gap Narrowing Making Parkrun More Inclusive.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trends in healthy life expectancy in the age of austerity.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David WalshGlasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, Scotland, UK david.walsh.2@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3390-5039
Gerry McCartneyPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-3521
Jon MintonPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Jane ParkinsonPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5697-1645
Deborah ShiptonPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Bruce WhyteGlasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPreviously improving life expectancy and all-cause mortality in the UK has stalled since the early 2010s. National analyses have demonstrated changes in mortality rates for most age groups and causes of death, and with deprived populations most affected. The aims here were to establish whether similar changes have occurred across different parts of the UK (countries, cities), and to examine cause-specific trends in more detail.

designPopulation-based trend analysis. PARTICIPANTS/

settingWhole populations of countries and selected cities of the UK. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: European age-standardised mortality rates (calculated by cause of death, country, city, year (1981-2017), age group, sex and-for all countries and Scottish cities-deprivation quintiles); changes in rates between 5-year periods; summary measures of both relative (relative index of inequality) and absolute (slope index of inequality) inequalities.

resultsChanges in mortality from around 2011/2013 were observed throughout the UK for all adult age groups. For example, all-age female rates decreased by approximately 4%-6% during the 1980s and 1990s, approximately 7%-9% during the 2000s, but by <1% between 2011/2013 and 2015/2017. Equivalent figures for men were 4%-7%, 8%-12% and 1%-3%, respectively. This later period saw increased mortality among the most deprived populations, something observed in all countries and cities analysed, and for most causes of death: absolute and relative inequalities therefore increased. Although similar trends were seen across all parts of the UK, particular issues apply in Scotland, for example, higher and increasing drug-related mortality (with the highest rates observed in Dundee and Glasgow).

conclusionsThe study presents further evidence of changing mortality in the UK. The timing, geography and socioeconomic gradients associated with the changes appear to support suggestions that they may result, at least in part, from UK Government 'austerity' measures which have disproportionately affected the poorest.

Indexed as

MortalityCause of DeathCitiesFemaleHumansMaleScotlandSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdomepidemiologypublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID33154048
PMCPMC7646340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.