Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33153665›Full record

ReviewClinics in perinatology2020

Contemporary Understanding of Ebola and Zika Virus in Pregnancy.

Lauren Sayres, Brenna L Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren SayresUniversity of Colorado, Academic Office 1, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 802, USA. Electronic address: laurensayres@gmail.com.
Brenna L HughesDuke University Hospital, 203 Baker House, 201 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University Hospital · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the pathophysiology, management, and prevention of emerging infectious diseases among pregnant women is imperative to achieve a successful response from the medical community. Ebola and Zika viruses represent infections with profound public health implications. In particular, Ebola virus is associated with high case fatality and pregnancy and neonatal loss rates, while Zika virus has been associated with multiple congenital anomalies; these features present critical clinical dilemmas for management of pregnant and reproductive aged women. The objective of this article is to summarize key background information and best practices for management of Ebola and Zika virus in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricFemaleHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMicrocephalyMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPersonal Protective EquipmentPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika Virus InfectionEbola virusEmerging infectious diseasesZika virus

Identifiers

PMID33153665
PMCPMC7566674
OpenAlexW3093156978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.