Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33153516›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2020

Non-bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage as a Refinement for Safely Obtaining High-quality Samples from Macaques.

Cassandra R Moats, Kurt T Randall, Tonya M Swanson, Hugh B Crank, Kimberly M Armantrout, Aaron M Barber-Axthelm, Nicole D Burnett, Theodore R Hobbs, Lauren D Martin, Roxanne M Gilbride and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MIP3α-RelVaccine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cassandra R MoatsInfectious Disease Resource, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon;, Email: moats@ohsu.edu.
Kurt T RandallVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Tonya M SwansonInfectious Disease Resource, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Hugh B CrankInfectious Disease Resource, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Kimberly M ArmantroutInfectious Disease Resource, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Aaron M Barber-AxthelmInfectious Disease Resource, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Nicole D BurnettInfectious Disease Resource, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Theodore R HobbsDivision of Comparative Medicine, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Lauren D MartinDivision of Comparative Medicine, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Roxanne M GilbrideVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Scott HansenVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Jeremy V SmedleyInfectious Disease Resource, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon.
Oregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (NB-BAL) is a minimally invasive diagnostic and research tool used to sample the cells of lower airways and alveoli without using a bronchoscope. Our study compared NB-BAL and bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (B-BAL) in terms of costs, cell yields, and the number of post-procedural complications in macaques. We also analyzed procedure times, BAL fluid volume yields, and vital signs in a subset of animals that underwent NB-BAL. Compared with the B-BAL technique, NB-BAL was less expensive to perform, with fewer complications, fewer animals requiring temporary or permanent cessation of BALs, and higher cell yields per mL of recovered saline. The average procedure time for NB-BAL was 6.8 ± 1.6 min, and the average NB-BAL lavage volume yield was 76 ± 9%. We found no significant differences in respiration rate before, during, or after NB-BAL but did find significant differences in heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂). This study demonstrates that NB-BAL is a simple, cost-effective, and safe alternative to B-BAL that results in higher cell yields per mL, improved animal welfare, and fewer missed time points, and thus constitutes a refinement over the B-BAL in macaques.

Indexed as

LungMacacaAnimalsBronchoalveolar LavageBronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

Identifiers

PMID33153516
PMCPMC7754202
OpenAlexW3095141397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.