Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33153484›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Effects of strategies to improve general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing home residents (interprof ACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Christiane Müller, Berit Hesjedal-Streller, Nina Fleischmann, Britta Tetzlaff, Tina Mallon, Martin Scherer, Sascha Köpke, Katrin Balzer, Linda Gärtner, Indre Maurer and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03426475 (Effects of Strategies to Improve General Practitioner-nurse Collaboration and Communication in Regard to Hospital Admissions of Nursing Home Residents.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03426475 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Strategies to Improve General Practitioner-nurse Collaboration and Communication in Regard to Hospital Admissions of Nursing Home Residents.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GoettingenRan2018 to 2021Enrolled680ConditionsUtilization of Medical Care by Nursing Home ResidentsArmsinterprof ACT measures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cost-benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Nursing home-sensitive conditions and approaches to reduce hospitalization of nursing home residents].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christiane MüllerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany. christiane.mueller@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7871-0884
Berit Hesjedal-StrellerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Nina FleischmannNursing Science, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Building 31, Room 122, Leipziger Straße 123, D-36037, Fulda, Germany.
Britta TetzlaffDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Tina MallonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin SchererDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Sascha KöpkeInstitute of Nursing Science, University Clinic Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, D-50935, Köln, Germany.
Katrin BalzerInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Group, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Linda GärtnerInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Group, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Indre MaurerChair of Organization and Corporate Development, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Eva HummersDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEFulda University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss 01VSF16029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, up to 50% of nursing home residents are admitted to a hospital at least once a year. It is often unclear whether this is beneficial or even harmful. Successful interprofessional collaboration and communication involving general practitioners (GPs) and nurses may improve medical care of nursing home residents. In the previous interprof study, the six-component intervention package interprof ACT was developed to facilitate collaboration of GPs and nurses in nursing homes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the interprof ACT intervention.

methodsThis multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial compares nursing homes receiving the interprof ACT intervention package for a duration of 12 months (e.g. comprising appointment of mutual contact persons, shared goal setting, standardised GPs' home visits) with a control group (care as usual). A total of 34 nursing homes are randomised, and overall 680 residents recruited. The intervention package is presented in a kick-off meeting to GPs, nurses, residents/relatives or their representatives. Nursing home nurses act as change agents to support local adaption and implementation of the intervention measures. Primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of hospitalisation within 12 months. Secondary outcomes include admissions to hospital, days admitted to hospital, use of other medical services, prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication and quality of life. Additionally, health economic and a mixed methods process evaluation will be performed. DISCUSSION: This study investigates a complex intervention tailored to local needs of nursing homes. Outcomes reflect the healthcare and health of nursing home residents, as well as the feasibility of the intervention package and its impact on interprofessional communication and collaboration. Because of its systematic development and its flexible nature, interprof ACT is expected to be viable for large-scale implementation in routine care services regardless of local organisational conditions and resources available for medical care for nursing home residents on a regular basis. Recommendations will be made for an improved organisation of primary care for nursing home residents. In addition, the results may provide important knowledge and data for the development and evaluation of further strategies to improve outpatient care for elderly care-receivers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03426475 . Initially registered on 7 February 2018.

Indexed as

General PractitionersNursesAgedCommunicationGermanyHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNursing HomesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicInterprofessional relationsNursing homesPhysician-nurse

Identifiers

PMID33153484
PMCPMC7643262
OpenAlexW3097633401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.