ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2020
PM
Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of observational studies on long-term air pollution exposure and epigenetic alterations in adults.Journal of global health · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular mechanisms of air pollution-induced carcinogenesis and the emerging role of microplastics.Human genomics · 2025Review
- DNA methylation of the IL6R gene moderates the association between biopsychosocial factors and depression.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Particulate matter-induced epigenetic modifications and lung complications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- Exploring the Synergistic Mechanism of AP2A2 Transcription Factor Inhibition via Molecular Modeling and Simulations as a Novel Computational Approach for Combating Breast Cancer: In Silico Interpretations.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParticulate matter (PM) < 2.5 μm (PM
methodsWe obtained DNA methylation and exercise data of 496 participants (aged between 30 and 70 years) from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) database. We also extracted PM
resultsDLEC1 methylation and PM
conclusionsWe found significant positive associations between PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.