Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33153153›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Harvest Programs in First Nations of Subarctic Canada: The Benefits Go Beyond Addressing Food Security and Environmental Sustainability Issues.

Leonard J S Tsuji, Stephen R J Tsuji, Aleksandra M Zuk, Roger Davey, Eric N Liberda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Indigenous land-based approaches to well-being: TheInternational journal of circumpolar health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. What Is Wellbeing, and What Is Important for Wellbeing? Indigenous Voices from across Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Indigenous Land-Based Approaches to Well-Being: TheInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Indigenous Land-Based Approaches to Well-Being: TheInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leonard J S TsujiDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.
Stephen R J TsujiSchool of Environmental Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Aleksandra M ZukDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.
Roger DaveyFort Albany First Nation, Fort Albany, ON P0L 1H0, Canada.
Eric N LiberdaSchool of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4579-4775
University of Toronto · CAAssembly of First Nations · CAQueen's University · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CA

Funding

CIHR 105525, MOP-133395, IAPH-151686, PJT-169169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By breaking down barriers that impacted the ability of subarctic First Nations people to harvest waterfowl, the Sharing-the-Harvest program provided a safe, nutritious, and culturally appropriate food (i.e., geese) to James Bay Cree communities while also helping to protect the environment by harvesting overabundant geese. However, the impacts extend beyond those described above. Thus, the objectives of the present paper are twofold: to document the food sharing networks of the Sharing-the-Harvest program; and to examine the benefits associated with the harvest program beyond food security and environmental sustainability issues, as revealed through semi-directed interviews. In the regional initiative, harvested geese were shared with all James Bay communities; sharing is an important part of Cree culture. Where detailed information was collected, the goose-sharing network reached 76% of the homes in one of the communities. Likewise, in the local initiative, the goose-sharing network had a 76% coverage rate of the homes in the community. Although decreasing food insecurity was an important focus of the harvest-sharing programs, there were other benefits, from an Indigenous perspective, of being on the land, as identified by the Cree harvesters through semi-directed interviews (e.g., the transmission of Indigenous knowledge, the strengthening of social networks, and the feeling of wellness while out on-the-land). Thus, by participating in the on-the-land harvest programs, the Cree gained benefits beyond those solely related to strengthening food security and contributing in part to environmental sustainability. The Sharing-the-Harvest protocol has the potential to be adapted and employed by other Indigenous (or marginalized) groups worldwide, to help improve health and wellness, while, also protecting the environment from overabundant and/or invasive species.

Indexed as

Food SecurityFood SupplyIndigenous CanadiansAnimalsBirdsCanadaHealth StatusHumansMinority GroupsFirst Nations of subarctic Canadafood securityharvesting of overabundant speciesIndigenous knowledge transmissionIndigenous peoples’ perspective of being on the landsharing networksstrengthening of social networkswellness

Identifiers

PMID33153153
PMCPMC7663715
OpenAlexW3095274275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.