Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33153130›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Circulating Tumour Cell Expression of Immune Markers as Prognostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Karl Payne, Matthew Pugh, Jill Brooks, Nikolaos Batis, Graham Taylor, Paul Nankivell, Hisham Mehanna

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karl PayneInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SY, UK.
Matthew PughInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Jill BrooksInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SY, UK.
Nikolaos BatisInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-7427
Graham TaylorInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Paul NankivellInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SY, UK.
Hisham MehannaInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SY, UK.
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T001755/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis remain high among head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, despite advancing cancer treatment modalities and therapeutic agents. One area that has generated considerable interest is the immune landscape of the tumour, heralding a wave of immune checkpoint inhibitors with notable efficacy in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC patients. However, HNSCC remains poorly served by biomarkers that can direct treatment in a personalised fashion to target the tumour heterogeneity seen between patients. Detection and analysis of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in HNSCC has provided a previously unseen view of the metastasis forming cells that are potentially contributing to poor clinical outcomes. In particular, identifying CTC expression of phenotypic and druggable protein markers has allowed CTC sub-populations to be defined that hold prognostic value or are potential therapeutic targets themselves. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the role of CTC immune-marker expression as prognostic/therapeutic biomarkers in HNSCC by evaluating progress to date and discussing areas for future research. Our results highlight how few studies have been able to demonstrate prognostic significance of immune-marker expression in CTCs. As expected, the immune checkpoint PD-L1 was the most widely investigated marker. However, no studies evaluated CTC target immune marker expression in immunotherapy cohorts. Despite these findings, the data presented demonstrate promise that CTCs may be a source of future biomarkers for immunotherapy and will provide valuable information regarding the potential immune evasion of these metastasis forming cells.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanImmunologic Factorscirculating tumour cellhead and neck cancerHNSCCimmune markerimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33153130
PMCPMC7662307
OpenAlexW3094932594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.