ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
On the robustness of deep learning-based lung-nodule classification for CT images with respect to image noise.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vascular graph network for ovarian lesion classification using optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Characterizing the effects of noncontrast head CT reconstruction kernel and slice thickness parameters on the performance of an automated AI algorithm in the evaluation of ischemic stroke.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
- Transparent and Robust Artificial Intelligence-Driven Electrocardiogram Model for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing the Collaboration Between Imaging and Radiation Oncology.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Noise-robustness test for ultrasound breast nodule neural network models as medical devices.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Improving small animal cone beam CT resolution by mitigating x-ray focal spot induced blurring via deconvolution.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- [Performance of low-dose CT image reconstruction for detecting intracerebral hemorrhage: selection of dose, algorithms and their combinations].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2022Article
- Image Recognition of Pediatric Pneumonia Based on Fusion of Texture Features and Depth Features.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Improving robustness of a deep learning-based lung-nodule classification model of CT images with respect to image noise.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- 3D axial-attention for lung nodule classification.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robustness is an important aspect when evaluating a method of medical image analysis. In this study, we investigated the robustness of a deep learning (DL)-based lung-nodule classification model for CT images with respect to noise perturbations. A deep neural network (DNN) was established to classify 3D CT images of lung nodules into malignant or benign groups. The established DNN was able to predict malignancy rate of lung nodules based on CT images, achieving the area under the curve of 0.91 for the testing dataset in a tenfold cross validation as compared to radiologists' prediction. We then evaluated its robustness against noise perturbations. We added to the input CT images noise signals generated randomly or via an optimization scheme using a realistic noise model based on a noise power spectrum for a given mAs level, and monitored the DNN's output. The results showed that the CT noise was able to affect the prediction results of the established DNN model. With random noise perturbations at 100 mAs, DNN's predictions for 11.2% of training data and 17.4% of testing data were successfully altered by at least once. The percentage increased to 23.4% and 34.3%, respectively, for optimization-based perturbations. We further evaluated robustness of models with different architectures, parameters, number of output labels, etc, and robustness concern was found in these models to different degrees. To improve model robustness, we empirically proposed an adaptive training scheme. It fine-tuned the DNN model by including perturbations in the training dataset that successfully altered the DNN's perturbations. The adaptive scheme was repeatedly performed to gradually improve DNN's robustness. The numbers of perturbations at 100 mAs affecting DNN's predictions were reduced to 10.8% for training and 21.1% for testing by the adaptive training scheme after two iterations. Our study illustrated that robustness may potentially be a concern for an exemplary DL-based lung-nodule classification model for CT images, indicating the needs for evaluating and ensuring model robustness when developing similar models. The proposed adaptive training scheme may be able to improve model robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.