Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33152666›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2020

Contribution of VitaPCR SARS-CoV-2 to the emergency diagnosis of COVID-19.

Pierre-Edouard Fournier, Christine Zandotti, Laetitia Ninove, Elsa Prudent, Philippe Colson, Céline Gazin, Matthieu Million, Hervé Tissot-Dupont, Florence Fenollar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Miniaturized Real-Time PCR systems for SARS-CoV-2 detection at the Point-of-Care.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical performance of the Abbott Panbio with nasopharyngeal, throat, and saliva swabs among symptomatic individuals with COVID-19.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Performance of the RT-LAMP-based eazyplex® SARS-CoV-2 as a novel rapid diagnostic test.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre-Edouard FournierIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, Marseille, France.
Christine ZandottiIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille Univ, IRD, Inserm, AP-HM, UVE, Marseille, France.
Laetitia NinoveIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille Univ, IRD, Inserm, AP-HM, UVE, Marseille, France.
Elsa PrudentIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Philippe ColsonIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Céline GazinIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Matthieu MillionIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Hervé Tissot-DupontIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Florence FenollarIHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, Marseille, France. Electronic address: florence.fenollar@univ-amu.fr.
Méditerranée Infection Foundation · FRInserm · FRAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the persistent COVID-19 pandemic, there is an urgent need to use rapid and reliable diagnostic tools for highly urgent cases. Antigen tests are disappointing with their lack of sensitivity. Among molecular tools allowing a diagnosis in less than an hour, only one, the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay, has exhibited a good sensitivity. However, we are also facing a global shortage of reagents and kits. Thus, it is imperative to evaluate other point-of-care molecular tests.

methodsWe evaluated the VitaPCR™ RT-PCR assay, whose sample analysis time is of approximately 20 min, in nasopharyngeal secretions from 534 patients presenting to our Institute, for the diagnosis of COVID-19, and compared it to our routine RT-PCR assay. We also compared the two assays with tenfold dilutions of a SARS-CoV-2 strain.

resultsCompared to our routine RT-PCR and the previous diagnosis of COVID-19, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of VitaPCR™ can be evaluated to be 99.3 % (155/156), 94.7 % (358/378), 88.6 % (155/175) and 99.7 % (358/359), respectively. Tenfold dilutions of a SARS-CoV-2 strain show that the VitaPCR™ was more sensitive that our routine RT-PCR assay.

conclusionThe VitaPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 is an accurate rapid test, suitable for clinical practice that can be performed as part of a point-of-care testing, for the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Emergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxPoint-of-Care TestingPredictive Value of TestsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityCOVID-19DiagnosisPoint-of-careRapid diagnostic testSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33152666
PMCPMC7598902
OpenAlexW3095388496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.