Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33152279›Full record

ReviewCell host & microbe2020

ACTIVating Resources for the COVID-19 Pandemic: In Vivo Models for Vaccines and Therapeutics.

Judith A Hewitt, Cathleen Lutz, William C Florence, M Louise M Pitt, Srinivas Rao, Jay Rappaport, Nancy L Haigwood

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell host & microbe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Animal models for COVID-19 and tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Nonhuman Primates in Translational Research.Annual review of animal biosciences · 2022
    Review
  20. UsingExpert opinion on drug discovery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Judith A HewittOffice of Biodefense, Research Resources and Translational Research, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: jhewitt@nih.gov.
Cathleen LutzIn Vivo Pharmacology, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
William C FlorenceOffice of Biodefense, Research Resources and Translational Research, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
M Louise M PittOffice of the Commander, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Srinivas RaoSanofi Research and Development, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Jay RappaportTulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
Nancy L HaigwoodOregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA. Electronic address: haigwoon@ohsu.edu.
National Institutes of Health · USJackson Laboratory · USOregon National Primate Research Center · USSanofi (United States) · USTulane University · USUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Preclinical Working Group of Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV), a public-private partnership spearheaded by the National Institutes of Health, has been charged with identifying, prioritizing, and communicating SARS-CoV-2 preclinical resources. Reviewing SARS-CoV-2 animal model data facilitates standardization and harmonization and informs knowledge gaps and prioritization of limited resources. To date, mouse, hamster, ferret, guinea pig, and non-human primates have been investigated. Several species are permissive for SARS-CoV-2 replication, often exhibiting mild disease with resolution, reflecting most human COVID-19 cases. More severe disease develops in a few models, some associated with advanced age, a risk factor for human disease. This review provides a snapshot that recommends the suitability of models for testing vaccines and therapeutics, which may evolve as our understanding of COVID-19 disease biology improves. COVID-19 is a complex disease, and individual models recapitulate certain aspects of disease; therefore, the coordination and assessment of animal models is imperative.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralVaccinesAnimalsBetacoronavirusCOVID-19CricetinaeGuinea PigsHumansMiceSARS-CoV-2Vaccinesanimal modelsCOVID-19hamstersmacaquesmiceSARS-CoV-2therapeuticsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID33152279
PMCPMC7528903
OpenAlexW3090330344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.