Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33152035›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Dynamic MRI of plantar flexion: A comprehensive repeatability study of electrical stimulation-gated muscle contraction standardized on evoked force.

Xeni Deligianni, Anna Hirschmann, Nicolas Place, Oliver Bieri, Francesco Santini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xeni DeligianniDivision of Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-223X
Anna HirschmannDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nicolas PlaceInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9044-0621
Oliver BieriDivision of Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Francesco SantiniDivision of Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6984-4816
University of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of skeletal muscle contraction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive method for studying muscle motion and deformation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of quantitative measures such as strain, based on single slice dynamic MRI synchronized with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and standardized to a similar relative force level across various individuals. Unilateral electrical stimulation of the triceps surae muscles was applied in eight volunteers during single-slice, three-directional phase contrast MRI acquisition at a 3T MRI scanner. To assess repeatability, the same process was executed on two different days by standardizing the stimulation aiming at evoking a fixed percentage of their maximal voluntary force in the same position. Except from the force, the effect of using the current as reference was evaluated on day two as a secondary acquisition. Finally, the presence of fatigue induced by NMES was assessed (on day one) by examining the difference between consecutive measurements. Strain maps were derived from the acquired slice at every time point; distribution of strain in the muscle and peak strain over the muscle of interest were evaluated for repeatability. It was found that fatigue did not have an appreciable effect on the results. The stimulation settings based on evoked force produced more repeatable results with respect to using the current as the only reference, with an intraclass correlation coefficient between different days of 0.95 for the former versus 0.88 for the latter. In conclusion, for repeatable strain imaging it is advisable to record the force output of the evoked contraction and use that for the standardization of the NMES setup rather than the current.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAdultElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33152035
PMCPMC7644050
OpenAlexW3095505102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.