Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33152016›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A machine learning approach to predict pancreatic islet grafts rejection versus tolerance.

Gerardo A Ceballos, Luis F Hernandez, Daniel Paredes, Luis R Betancourt, Midhat H Abdulreda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gerardo A CeballosKnoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Luis F HernandezDiabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Daniel ParedesKnoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Luis R BetancourtKnoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0791-6113
Midhat H AbdulredaDiabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0146-5876

Funding

Aptamer chimeras for the in vivo modulation of beta cell mass and immunogenicityUC4DK116241 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ABDULREDA, MIDHAT H, SERAFINI, PAOLO · 2017 to 2017
$2.0M
Role of macrophages in pancreatic islet graft rejectionK01DK097194 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ABDULREDA, MIDHAT H · 2013 to 2015
$415k
Mechanisms of islet transplant immune toleranceR56AI130330 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ABDULREDA, MIDHAT H · 2017 to 2017
$384k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI130330NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK097194NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK116241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in biomedical research promises to unlock new information from the vast amounts of data being generated through the delivery of healthcare and the expanding high-throughput research applications. Such information can aid medical diagnoses and reveal various unique patterns of biochemical and immune features that can serve as early disease biomarkers. In this report, we demonstrate the feasibility of using an AI/ML approach in a relatively small dataset to discriminate among three categories of samples obtained from mice that either rejected or tolerated their pancreatic islet allografts following transplant in the anterior chamber of the eye, and from naïve controls. We created a locked software based on a support vector machine (SVM) technique for pattern recognition in electropherograms (EPGs) generated by micellar electrokinetic chromatography and laser induced fluorescence detection (MEKC-LIFD). Predictions were made based only on the aligned EPGs obtained in microliter-size aqueous humor samples representative of the immediate local microenvironment of the islet allografts. The analysis identified discriminative peaks in the EPGs of the three sample categories. Our classifier software was tested with targeted and untargeted peaks. Working with the patterns of untargeted peaks (i.e., based on the whole pattern of EPGs), it was able to achieve a 21 out of 22 positive classification score with a corresponding 95.45% prediction accuracy among the three sample categories, and 100% accuracy between the rejecting and tolerant recipients. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of AI/ML approaches to classify small numbers of samples and they warrant further studies to identify the analytes/biochemicals corresponding to discriminative features as potential biomarkers of islet allograft immune rejection and tolerance.

Indexed as

AnimalsArtificial IntelligenceDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalFemaleForecastingGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalImmune ToleranceImmunosuppression TherapyIslets of LangerhansIslets of Langerhans TransplantationIsoantigensMachine LearningMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLIsoantigens

Identifiers

PMID33152016
PMCPMC7644021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.