Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Status of the WHO recommended timing and frequency of antenatal care visits in Northern Bangladesh.

Bidhan Krishna Sarker, Musfikur Rahman, Tanjina Rahman, Tawhidur Rahman, Jubaida Jahan Khalil, Mehedi Hasan, Fariya Rahman, Anisuddin Ahmed, Dipak Kumar Mitra, Malay Kanti Mridha and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bidhan Krishna SarkerMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1479-158X
Musfikur RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tanjina RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tawhidur RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jubaida Jahan KhalilMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mehedi HasanMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Fariya RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Anisuddin AhmedMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Dipak Kumar MitraDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Malay Kanti MridhaProfessor and Director of Centre of Excellence for Non-Communicable Disease, James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Anisur RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is dearth of information on the timeliness of antenatal care (ANC) uptake. This study aimed to determine the timely ANC uptake by a medically trained provider (MTP) as per the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations and the country guideline.

methodsCross-sectional survey was done with 2,731 women having livebirth outcome in last one year in Dinajpur, Nilphamari and Rajshahi districts, Bangladesh from August-November,2016.

resultsAbout 82%(2,232) women received at least one ANC from a MTP. Overall, 78%(2,142) women received 4 or more ANCs by any provider and 43%(1168) from a MTP. Only 14%(378) women received their first ANC at the 1st trimester by a MTP. As per 4 schedule visits by the WHO FANC model and the country guideline 8%(203) and 20%(543) women respectively received the first 2 timely ANC by a MTP; where only 1%(32) and 3%(72) received the first 3 visits timely and 0.6%(17) and 1%(29) received all the four timely visits. Factors significantly associated with the first two timely visits are: 10 or above years of schooling of women [adj. OR 2.13 (CI: 1.05, 4.30)] and their husbands [adj. OR 2.40 (CI: 1.31, 4.38)], women's employment [adj. OR 2.32 (CI: 1.43, 3.76)], urban residential status [adj. OR 3.49 (CI: 2.46, 4.95)] and exposure to mass media [adj. OR 1.58 (CI: 1.07, 2.34)] at 95% confidence interval. According to the 2016 WHO ANC model, only 1.5%(40) women could comply with the first two ANC contacts timely by a MTP and no one could comply with all the timely 8 contacts.

conclusionDespite high coverage of ANC utilization, timely ANC visit is low as per both the WHO recommendations and the country guideline. For better understanding, further studies on the timeliness of ANC coverage are required to design feasible intervention for improving maternal and child health.

Indexed as

AdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusEmploymentFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMalePrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsWorld Health OrganizationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33151964
PMCPMC7644040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.