Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Air and surface measurements of SARS-CoV-2 inside a bus during normal operation.

Piero Di Carlo, Piero Chiacchiaretta, Bruna Sinjari, Eleonora Aruffo, Liborio Stuppia, Vincenzo De Laurenzi, Pamela Di Tomo, Letizia Pelusi, Francesca Potenza, Angelo Veronese and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Piero Di CarloDepartment of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4971-4509
Piero ChiacchiarettaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Bruna SinjariDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4444-3343
Eleonora AruffoDepartment of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Liborio StuppiaDepartment of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Vincenzo De LaurenziCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology-CAST, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Pamela Di TomoCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology-CAST, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-3306
Letizia PelusiCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology-CAST, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Francesca PotenzaCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology-CAST, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Angelo VeroneseCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology-CAST, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Jacopo VecchietDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Katia FalascaDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Claudio UcciferriDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transmission pathways of SARS-CoV-2 are aerosol, droplet and touching infected material. The diffusion of the virus contagion among people is easier in indoor location, but direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 in air or on surfaces is quite sparse, especially regarding public transport, while it would be important to know how and if it is safe to use them. To answer these questions we analysed the air and the surfaces most usually touched by passengers inside a city bus during normal operation, in order to understand the possible spreading of the virus and the effectiveness of the protective measures. The measurements were carried out across the last week of the lockdown and the first week when, gradually, all the travel restrictions were removed. The air and surface samples were analysed with the RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. After two weeks of measurements and more than 1100 passenger travelling on the bus the virus was never detected both on surfaces and on air, suggesting that the precautions adopted on public transportation are effective in reducing the COVID-19 spreading.

Indexed as

AerosolsAir MicrobiologyMotor VehiclesBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansItalyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2TravelAerosols

Identifiers

PMID33151953
PMCPMC7644043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.