Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151638›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in molecular biology2020

Base Editing in Human Cells to Produce Single-Nucleotide-Variant Clonal Cell Lines.

Carlos A Vasquez, Quinn T Cowan, Alexis C Komor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Haplotype editing with CRISPR-Cas9 as a therapeutic approach for dominant-negative missense mutations in NEFL.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. FunctionalScience advances · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos A VasquezDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Quinn T CowanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Alexis C KomorDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Contemporary Approaches to Cancer Cell Signaling and CommunicationT32CA009523 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DONOGHUE, DANIEL J, YANG, JING · 1985 to 2025
$12.1M
MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008326 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMIVES, ELIZABETH A. · 1989 to 2020
$7.5M
Development of New Genome Editing Agents Using RNA Modifying EnzymesR21GM135736 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMOR, ALEXIS C. · 2019 to 2019
$205k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009523NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM135736NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Base-editing technologies enable the introduction of point mutations at targeted genomic sites in mammalian cells, with higher efficiency and precision than traditional genome-editing methods that use DNA double-strand breaks, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription-activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) system. This allows the generation of single-nucleotide-variant isogenic cell lines (i.e., cell lines whose genomic sequences differ from each other only at a single, edited nucleotide) in a more time- and resource-effective manner. These single-nucleotide-variant clonal cell lines represent a powerful tool with which to assess the functional role of genetic variants in a native cellular context. Base editing can therefore facilitate genotype-to-phenotype studies in a controlled laboratory setting, with applications in both basic research and clinical applications. Here, we provide optimized protocols (including experimental design, methods, and analyses) to design base-editing constructs, transfect adherent cells, quantify base-editing efficiencies in bulk, and generate single-nucleotide-variant clonal cell lines. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Design and production of plasmids for base-editing experiments Basic Protocol 2: Transfection of adherent cells and harvesting of genomic DNA Basic Protocol 3: Genotyping of harvested cells using Sanger sequencing Alternate Protocol 1: Next-generation sequencing to quantify base editing Basic Protocol 4: Single-cell isolation of base-edited cells using FACS Alternate Protocol 2: Single-cell isolation of base-edited cells using dilution plating Basic Protocol 5: Clonal expansion to generate isogenic cell lines and genotyping of clones.

Indexed as

Clone CellsGene EditingPoint MutationCell LineCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansbase editinggenome editingisogenic cell linessingle-nucleotide variant

Identifiers

PMID33151638
PMCPMC7654285
OpenAlexW3097318701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.